• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

MV F-4E Phantom II Released!

JLaars said:
Hi guys

Sorry Iam new and this is my first message.

Ok. you're right. It isa mistake I want to fix this.
I also want to fixthe brightness of the fuselage.


Now I'm in working in SAF repaint,but when finished this job. I will be working in improving thisrepaint

Regards
Joe Laars
Click to expand...

Thank you! Your effort is much appreciated. I know it is not a simple repaint and I think you have nailed the feeling of it. Roundel is a small detail but easily fixable.
 
Thank you


It still take some time because it is a real job for a real plane of the SAF. We are designing a good drawing.(I think...)


I dont want forget the phantom, because it is one of my favorite aircraft ... Childhood memories, you know... and MILVIZ is finishing an impressive project.


Yes, I want to return with F4. Especially in refining my repaints ... and my blog because I have forgotten and needs some works


Regards
Joe
 
MV_F-4_Phantom_167.jpg

MV_F-4_Phantom_168.jpg
 
To the owners of both this phine looking Phantom and the equally great F-15E from Milviz my question is this, How do the frame rates compare between these 2 fast movers? Specifically is the Phantom higher or lower on fps. On my system the Strike is a little heavy but usable. I want the Phantom bad but if it is the same or heavier on fps then it wouldn't work out that well for me in the end. Any help would be appreciated thanks in advance.
 
RKinkor said:
To the owners of both this phine looking Phantom and the equally great F-15E from Milviz my question is this, How do the frame rates compare between these 2 fast movers? Specifically is the Phantom higher or lower on fps. On my system the Strike is a little heavy but usable. I want the Phantom bad but if it is the same or heavier on fps then it wouldn't work out that well for me in the end. Any help would be appreciated thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
I think the F-4 is better on frame rates as it is. I don't know if this will even out when it gets radar and such.
 
joe bob said:
I think the F-4 is better on frame rates as it is. I don't know if this will even out when it gets radar and such.
Click to expand...

No any problems with fps (like with JF Tornado...). Here I have in the air 55-59 (blocked at 60) and on the airfiled 44-48 so very good and stable levels.
 
To yoyo and Dumonceau, do either of you have the Milviz Strike Eagle how does the Rhino compare more or less fps than the Strike Eagle?
 
IMHO the Phantom is a better performer than the F-15E, but marginally so. Both are excellent performers on my rig.

Johan
 
YoYo said:
No any problems with fps (like with JF Tornado...). Here I have in the air 55-59 (blocked at 60) and on the airfiled 44-48 so very good and stable levels.
Click to expand...

Hi friend.
Why you have blocked fsx at 60 fps? Are you running without vertical sink and forcing vsink in fsx.cfg ?

Just for information.

Tks

Andrea
 
Hi Andrea, V-sync works for me for sure (cfg mod), but half a refresh rate is too less for me (30fps).
I see differenece in frame per seconds with more than 36 vs 30 but decided to take for full refresh rate of monitor.
 
There wont be a drop with the radar display because it is actually already in place and optimised etc. Just not operative because a few key pieces of kit necessary for TACPACK aren't in. Its all on the GPU anyway so if your GPU is good enough, no hits.
 
Superb Screens YoYo :adoration: ... I would hate to be on the receiving off that firepower on a strafing run ! I'd really be doing the :running:
 
YoYo said:
Hi Andrea, V-sync works for me for sure (cfg mod), but half a refresh rate is too less for me (30fps).
I see differenece in frame per seconds with more than 36 vs 30 but decided to take for full refresh rate of monitor.
Click to expand...

Thank you very much :beguiled:
 
Hi,

To my knowledge so was the last USAF F-4E to go to war from the 3rd TFW/3rd TFS from Clark AB in the Philippines. They flew late model E's with all the addons which were available and were among the last USAF E wings. For operation Desert Storm the 3rd sent several F-4Es to Incirlik AB, Turkey, were they flew missions as part of the 7440 Composite wing. Among these E's were 73-1199 which was painted up as the "Flagship" for the 13th Air Force (HQ also located at Clark).

Scrshot1377.jpg~original
 
So how about some feedback on how the Phantom handles.
What do you think of how it flies with external stores?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top