• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

My Big Question...!

How often do you fly in multiplayer, either FSHost, Gamespy, VATSIM, IVAO, etc. ?

  • Often

    Votes: 38 18.1%

  • Rarely

    Votes: 34 16.2%

  • Never/Not often enough to mention

    Votes: 138 65.7%
  • Total voters
    210
K

Kiwikat

Motorcycling Kat
I've been wondering this for a long time.

SOH is a tightly knit online community, however we can never get a multiplayer event together. I've noticed this on other forums as well. So I've got a few questions about multiplayer.

1.) Please vote in the poll.

2.) If you do use multiplayer, why? If you don't use multiplayer, why not?

3.) Why do you think others DON'T use multiplayer?


Please take a minute to vote and answer the questions.

Thanks guys! I hope to get a discussion going... :ernae:
 
1.) I voted often.

2.) I fly multiplayer because it is a good opportunity to get to know others in the community on a more personal level while enjoying a hobby we share. It adds a personal experience to the sim that you do not get when flying by yourself. You can also do cool things like fly-ins, formations, and racing in multiplayer.

3.) I'm not entirely sure why others don't use multiplayer. That is part of the reason I made this thread. I think a lot of it has to do with shyness. People are comfortable doing their own thing and don't see any reason to try anything new. Perhaps I am wrong though...
 
I fly about 25 hours a week over at RWATC http://www.realworldatc.com/index.php
I can rebt my tiedown or jetway and rack up E-cash and learn at my own pace to fly with a ATC then have a push and shove Vatsim--- just my personal opion on Vatsim and how I feel. I commend:icon29: all who fly excellent at Vatsim.
 
I didn't participate in the poll as I mostly fly in MP (in fact most of my flying is done in MP when not beta testing or painting) but I almost never use any of the MP options listed as 95% of the time I fly on a direct connection with friends.
 
Tako_Kichi said:
I didn't participate in the poll as I mostly fly in MP (in fact most of my flying is done in MP when not beta testing or painting) but I almost never use any of the MP options listed as 95% of the time I fly on a direct connection with friends.
Click to expand...

That is what the etc. is for ;) So please select often if you could.

Could you guys PLEASE answer my #3 question?
 
Great question. Actually you could even split it into a question about what server we most often use and why. . .man this would be almost as long a thread as the one for the L-39, lol.
I fly MP flights at least 4 times a week on several different servers all using FSHost Client. Why?. . .just more interesting that way. I may go online with the intention of flying a current hoplist and end up flying a totally different flightplan with a bunch of the folks on the server, always interesting.

There are at least a few reasons I run into all the time for why others don't use MP. Some servers ask that use Team Speak for Comm, not a lot, but some. . .most servers have it available but it's up to you to use it or not. But in some cases, where you are asked to use it to eliminate the chat window (just get's in the way and I rarely answer a chat message when I'm flying because I don't want to take the time, during an approach to go type an answer) some pilots will simply not fly because they don't speak very good english or they don't like the way they sound or they don't speak english at all.
Another reason I've found is that on an FS9 server, there is a conflict with ICAO codes matching between the sims, so if you're flying FSX, there could be half a dozen airports that don't match what FS9 shows and you can be stuck at one airport if you can't use the ?hop= trigger to jump to the next hop. I finally quit flying a few servers because there wasn't an admin available most of the time to monitor the flights and get you out of situations like that.
 
Those who are answering "Never", could you please elaborate why? This poll is mostly targeted at you.
 
direct connect - flightsimnation / ventrillo , ... and once in a while gamespy
- single player is for beta testing only usually
 
For me, as a developer I spend my time in a pretty constant loop of model/export/check in sim...I hardly fly on my own for 'fun'. Maybe an hour a week! With that in mind, I hope you can understand why I have little time or interest in the multiplayer thing ;)
 
I never have and never will see MSFS as a multiplayer sim.
My first and only time of flying online was back with FS98. We all started at Meigs, but the group dispersed immediately after take-off.
This kind of spoiled it for me, since it was no different from singleplayer, except for a bunch of dudes located somewhere in the area.

I don't see much purpose in multiplayer free flight anyways. What's there to be done except practising formation flights?

Online tube driving isn't any better. You'll have to sign up here and there, get various programs, disable your AI and most probably won't even have a controller anywhere near you.

However, I like things like FSEconomy and FSAirlines, which add a bit of competition and purpose to the whole "commercial" flying in MSFS via an online community and an economy system.
The best thing about them is that I can still fly like I usually do - offline, with Radar Contact running and tons of AI.
To be honest, I couldn't care less if that contrail crossing my path is Bernd from Munich or a generic AI pilot. They're both just callsigns and flight numbers. As soon as they've passed me, they're gone both from my view and from my mind.

FS skies belong to me and my AI alone.
 
WOW, I am already amazed at the Poll numbers. The servers I fly on always seem to have pretty good participation, not huge mind you, but decent numbers.
This is where the option for what method of MP most people use might also play into why they don't fly online much. Some folks are passionate about VATSIM, just think it's the only way to go, but most that I talk to online gave it shot and said "no thanks". . .Reason? VATSIM controllers are a mix of retired ATC, current ATC, Licensed Pilots and folks who just get into the whole ATC concept. On all accounts I think that's awesome because you know the majority of those folks have been there. What I found from personal experience and discussions with others is that VATSIM isn't someplace you can just pop into, setup a flight and enjoy the flight time. These guys expect you to know the ATC system and adhere to it and if you don't. . ."please stay out of the way". Bam. . .I'm outta there, I have enough pressure on a day to day basis without having to have a glass of Alka-Seltzer at the ready when I'm flying online, lol.

So, that may be one reason that some folks step away from online flying, if they think that every server is going to be some form of what they heard VATSIM is like.
 
Yeah I tried VATSIM for a little bit. It isn't really my thing. I'd prefer to have fun with a group of friends on gamespy, direct connect, or FSHost. Teamspeak is also nice...
 
Never have done MP in FSX, but love it in FS9. I won’t fly FS anything in window mode, and you can only fly MP in FSX if you fly in window mode. That’s a deal breaker, so I do MP only in FS9.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:eek:ffice" /><o:p></o:p>
MP is what has made FS loads of fun for me. We sometimes hear talk of “immersion” in FS. Well, for me, MP has made FS “immersive”. Talking to my on-line flying shipmates is fun!
 
i flew with a lot of virtual militaries only recently to leave that area behind but i try my best to at least go onto a few sessions with freinds although since the move i doubt i will get much if at all online flying for a while
 
Bjoern brings up another facet of MP Flight (this isn't a swing at you either Bjoern). His only venture into MP flight was back during FS98 when a group got together and after take off immediately went their separate ways. . .I don't blame you for thinking "is that it?", lol.
An example of an organized MP flight would be the folks at WSP (World's Serious Pilots). Every Wednesday evening they get together for a group flight, usually at least an hour in duration and most of the time everyone is flying the same airplane. They have a set flightplan, everyone knows the route, altitude, airspeed, etc and real world weather. Off they go and all use TS for Comm, so there's chatter going on almost non-stop. Bill Holland's NJ Short Hops is another place that always has a good group of pilots flying as well as Figs Hops and a few others. Things have changed since FS98.
 
falcon409 said:
WOW, I am already amazed at the Poll numbers. The servers I fly on always seem to have pretty good participation, not huge mind you, but decent numbers.
This is where the option for what method of MP most people use might also play into why they don't fly online much. Some folks are passionate about VATSIM, just think it's the only way to go, but most that I talk to online gave it shot and said "no thanks". . .Reason? VATSIM controllers are a mix of retired ATC, current ATC, Licensed Pilots and folks who just get into the whole ATC concept. On all accounts I think that's awesome because you know the majority of those folks have been there. What I found from personal experience and discussions with others is that VATSIM isn't someplace you can just pop into, setup a flight and enjoy the flight time. These guys expect you to know the ATC system and adhere to it and if you don't. . ."please stay out of the way". Bam. . .I'm outta there, I have enough pressure on a day to day basis without having to have a glass of Alka-Seltzer at the ready when I'm flying online, lol.

So, that may be one reason that some folks step away from online flying, if they think that every server is going to be some form of what they heard VATSIM is like.
Click to expand...

That is the whole reason why i choose to fly over at RWATC. You can actually enjoy your flight time and ATC in harmony.
 
Voted Rarely. Haven't flown FSX MP, but I used to do weekly missions with IL2. Hope that counts a little. ;)

I used to fly MP on HyperLobby, but IP to IP is better overall with less problems. And we used TeamSpeak for coms.
 
I know it is a bit farfetched but I think it would be cool to make a Sim Outhouse multiplayer group... :kilroy:

We have such a nice community here. I don't see why it wouldn't be possible to extend it from the internet into the simulator...
 
Kiwikat said:
Those who are answering "Never", could you please elaborate why? This poll is mostly targeted at you.
Click to expand...

I fly very structured flight plans most the time, concentrating on as much realism as possible (flying by 'the rules', observing correct altitude, space, etc.). Plus, when I fly, it is my 'personal get away time'. Finally, I never remember my father or his pilot buddies ever going up to fly in formation (or whatever), so it just has no interest to me. I just cannot relate to it based on my real world flying experiance. I suppose dad would have done this in the Air Force, obviously, but he never allowed me to join him back in those days :icon_lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top