• Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning old domain name stealing credentials

  • Special Server Maintenance

    Just when you think you have everything running some what better...

    You get a message from the Hosting company. Short story they need to move us to a new server. I have been working with them to plan a good date for all concerned. Here is what we have come up with as a schedule.

    1. November 4th 17:00 -5UTC shut off the forums and start backup proceedures. During this time there will be no access to the forums or the Resource Section.
    2. November 5th Continue with Backups and download same until complete.
    3. November 6th 7:00 turn over server to hosting company to move system to new server
    4. November 7th - 8th restore backups and upgrade forum software.

    If all goes well we should be back online on November 8th.

    To keep you updated we will post updates on AVSIM forums.

    Thank you for your support.

New AH: Stinson L5 on the desk

Status
Not open for further replies.
You are missing the point entirely. The "judgemental" element is coming from you, not us. You assume that a) we have got things wrong and b) we are not going to correct any errors if there are any. So just because you don't know what references we use you assume ours are wrong or not the same as say John's? All we ask is for a little respect in that after 17 years we might know what we are doing.


What I don't understand is why developer's continue to post early, incorrect renderings and then not expect people to comment or pass judgement on the inaccuracies presented. It's just a natural response, especially in a forum like this one where there are people with lifetime's of aviation expertise.
 
What I don't understand is why developer's continue to post early, incorrect renderings and then not expect people to comment or pass judgement on the inaccuracies presented. It's just a natural response, especially in a forum like this one where there are people with lifetime's of aviation expertise.

Let me help you understand DVJ.

It's a free internet ( for now ) people can criticise based on wip/in progress shots all they like, no problems. But be prepared for the "natural response " from the developer. Especially with the very real situation of people with agendas posting publicly innocuous and seemingly innocent criticisms which are actually far more than they seem.

So what is a developer to do? Does a dev now not talk about anything at all until it is absolutely ready? Do we muzzle developers? Or do we embrace the fact that if you are going to " pass judgement on the inaccuracies presented. " without taking into account it is a work in progress early dev pic then you to will receive a "natural response ".
 
Let me try to help you understand Piloto von Piloto

What I see is somebody offering help. When you don't want or need it it fine. But the way you react is with "One of the reasons we no longer frequent forums is that we are so tired of people telling us how we should do our job or what we should or should not do", is in my opinion quite blunt (and that is mildly said).

I understand you don't want help here, are not interested in the opinion of members here and just get tired from them. Therefore I seriously wonder what you are doing here.

When you are here just to annoy the members here, I rather have you will stick to your plan not to frequent forums anymore.

I decided to this thread as I don't think this leads anywhere.

Huub
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top