Panther_99FS
Retired SOH Administrator
So they mentioned that there are only about 4 Indycar drivers eligible. I figure these are as follows:
-Montoya
-Bourdais
-Dixon
-Castroneves?
-Power?
-Montoya
-Bourdais
-Dixon
-Castroneves?
-Power?
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
Montoya, Castroneves, Dixon and Power.
Bourdais didn't get good results enough the past 4 years.
You need experience with good results enough within the past 3 years. So yes, a back runner experience in the past is not enough.So Bourdais' previous F1 experience in Toro Rosso means nothing with the new rules?

so what IS a super Lic and why does it mater?..is this just a way to make F1 drivers seem to be the world leaders?...i wish to remind...not many F1 or indy car drivers have had success in nascar..and dont tell me sam hornish has done well..he hasnt..at best hes a front runner in xfinity series...he out right stunk in cup...but i must give him credit for sticking with the stock cars.btw..when steve kinser came from the world of outlaws,every one said he would eat up the cup guys...he didnt..nor did his kid..and they were sent packin back to sprint cars...
atleast i was offered a ride in busch back in '83...

so what IS a super Lic and why does it mater?..is this just a way to make F1 drivers seem to be the world leaders?...i wish to remind...not many F1 or indy car drivers have had success in nascar..and dont tell me sam hornish has done well..he hasnt..at best hes a front runner in xfinity series...he out right stunk in cup...but i must give him credit for sticking with the stock cars.btw..when steve kinser came from the world of outlaws,every one said he would eat up the cup guys...he didnt..nor did his kid..and they were sent packin back to sprint cars...
atleast i was offered a ride in busch back in '83...
This is not against NASCAR drivers, and I agree to say NASCAR drivers are not inferior to F1 drivers. NASCAR and F1 (or more generally open-wheel) are too much different to make a fair comparison. A good open-wheel driver will not necessarily make a good NASCAR driver, nor a good NASCAR driver will necessarily make a good open-wheel driver.
FIA and Formula 1 officials just don't want to see too young drivers coming directly to F1 anymore without having enough open-wheel experience.
Open-wheel drivers usually don't come directly to Sprint Cup. They often enter some ARCA, Xfinity or Truck Series events before that.
Formula 1 is considered to be the top of international open-wheel series. But before coming to the top, you have to gain experience enough at lower levels. This is what F1 officials are aiming to.
And before you whine, note that I wrote "is considered", because I think IndyCar Series is at the same competition level as F1, just not as technological as F1.![]()
You need experience with good results enough within the past 3 years. So yes, a back runner experience in the past is not enough.
If this is the case, then Montoya should not be on the list either. Since he left F1, he has only had good results this season.