• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

New Learjet 23 add-on

No, too bad it uses the default Lear VC.... argh!


Yeah, I just saw that.

The cockpit window shape is also a little funky.

I wish we had more corporate jet add-ons in FSX. You'd think there would be more learjets created by add-on developers. I am about all airbus'd and boeing'd out.
 
I wish we had more corporate jet add-ons in FSX. You'd think there would be more learjets created by add-on developers. I am about all airbus'd and boeing'd out.

Oh I hear you!

Falcon, Gulfstream (yeah yeah I know about their lame policy), Raytheon!

All we really have right now are Eaglesoft's Citations and Flight1's C510 Mustang.
 
Oh I hear you!

Falcon, Gulfstream (yeah yeah I know about their lame policy), Raytheon!

All we really have right now are Eaglesoft's Citations and Flight1's C510 Mustang.

Yeah, talk about an untapped market. I am no FS Market specialist, but I think a good older model Learjet would make a killing. I personally would LOVE a TBM 700 (yeah, not a learjet, but a corporate type of aircraft no less!).
 
Yeah like a native King Air 200 or Super 350!! A TBM would be nice as well, I'll take an 850 though haha

Flight1 was supposed to be working on a King Air 200 but it might have got canned... not sure

The only business-like turboprop up and coming I know of is RealAir's Royal Turbine Mod for their wonderful Duke:
http://realairsimulations.com/duke09/intro.php?page=duke09_intro
http://www.royalturbine.com/

Also there is a learjet 23 I think with a VC, located here:
http://20series.xtremeprototypes.com/en/

To be honest, the model looks a little dated (as in fs98 style) but I've heard good things about it
 
Yeah like a native King Air 200 or Super 350!! A TBM would be nice as well, I'll take an 850 though haha

Flight1 was supposed to be working on a King Air 200 but it might have got canned... not sure

The only business-like turboprop up and coming I know of is RealAir's Royal Turbine Mod for their wonderful Duke:
http://realairsimulations.com/duke09/intro.php?page=duke09_intro
http://www.royalturbine.com/

Also there is a learjet 23 I think with a VC, located here:
http://20series.xtremeprototypes.com/en/

To be honest, the model looks a little dated (as in fs98 style) but I've heard good things about it

A while back, I thought I read somewhere that Flight1 was working on a TBM 700 as well as an older model Lear. With the popularity of the Meridia they created some time ago, I bet a TBM 700 or a 850 would do really well.

That Xtreme Prototypes Lear I have heard mixed thigs about. The visual model is supposed to be really good but the FDE is supposed to be a little wacky. I thik it comes with a few differet models of the Lear though. The VC, from what I've read, seems to have a really like or really dislike sort of following. From the pics, it would seem the devs took a straight forward and rather flat approach to the VC textures which some seem to be really put off by while others seem to like them quite a bit. I guess it is a toss up on that one. At a price of close to $40, I would like to see some pretty defiitive "positives" to the add-on.

A 850 would be REALLY nice. :D
 
Yeah like a native King Air 200 or Super 350!! A TBM would be nice as well, I'll take an 850 though haha

Last I heard MAAM Sim was supposed to be doing their TBM for FSX too. But that was last year, and I've heard nothing on it since then. I will find out tho at the WWII Weekend this June 4th, 5th, and 6th if it's being worked on.
 
Last I heard MAAM Sim was supposed to be doing their TBM for FSX too. But that was last year, and I've heard nothing on it since then. I will find out tho at the WWII Weekend this June 4th, 5th, and 6th if it's being worked on.

ahaha I think you're talking about a TBM avenger while we're talking about a TBM Socata:
http://www.tbm850.com/
 
Thanks for the heads up on this. I love the Lear 23. Awesome lines on this plane. Love those short wings and huge wingtanks....

I hope he updates to his own VC soon.


Bill
 
I gotta say, that product looks horrid. The texture around the canopy is warped, the engines are modeled wrong, no wing fillet, ugh. Too many to list. Im staying away from this one.
 
There are flaws - make your own comparisons:
http://secure.simmarket.com/franz-luftfahrt-learjet-23.phtml (screenshots #2 & #4)
vs
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/middle/5/0/7/1524705.jpg

Yes, the cockpit window lines are incorrect... I dunno.. it might have the correct number of rivets on the wing panels which would certainly redeem it somewhat...

Of course, as a pilot I rarely get to admire/nitpick the exterior details at FL350 or 140kts on short final. Now if it never flies and resides in a museum that charges 16 Euro for admission I'd expect perfection...
 
Wow. You mean just having the correct number of rivits on a panel can redeem poor modeling, lazy UV mapping and just sloppy work? If I knew that in the past, it would of saved me a LOT of work. Ugh!

Well I will keep that in mind for future products though! :173go1:
 
Back
Top