I love the trial and rent options. No more buying a plane and being disappointed or finding conflicts/performance issues.
And also, there's a big part of me that's a "test flier." I have a lot of planes I've bought, flown for a couple of days, and then hangared and thought "I'll get back to this one!" And I rarely do. This won't cut into sales, though -- companies will get a rent fee from me for the planes I'd like to try but would never drop $60 on. And other companies will get full purchases because I won't have made the mistake of blowing my monthly MSFS budget on a plane that turned out to be a disappointment or not really engaging.
From your perspective, what's the advantage to ordering through Steam vs. from MS?
The choice is simple for anyone who has already bought FS2020: Whatever store you bought FS2020 from, make sure you buy FS2024 from the
same store unless you've bought nothing at all from the in-game marketplace. Bizarrely, Marketplace purchases in one store don't show up on the other. If you switch, you lose all your Marketplace purchases.
I don't understand the almost religious desire some folks have to have the game on Steam vs. from the Microsoft Store. You're just adding a whole second layer of services that can be down or go awry. The files and servers are all still hosted by Microsoft, so you're now doubling the companies you're depending on. If you'd rather see Gabe Newell get 30% of the money instead of MS, I guess that's a reason? (But I'd rather MS get the money to keep developing more MSFS.) There is
zero advantage to buying FS2024 on Steam over the MS Store unless you bought FS2020 from Steam.
(And according to SteamDB, I've purchased
639 games on Steam in the 19.8 years I've been a member there. I am not exactly anti-Steam. I love it for games. But for flight sims -- MSFS, DCS, and IL-2 -- there are clear advantages on all three platforms to
not buying from Steam if you're not already invested in marketplace purchases there.)