NVidia GTX 285 or 295?

[noddy]

I currently have dual 8800GTX 768 mb, and wonder if there would big gains in FSX by changing to either the 285 or 295?

My systems specs are:-

Dell 720 H2C
Intel QX 6850 clocked to 3.33Ghz
Vista Ulitmate 32 Bit
4GB of Ram - 800Mhz DDR2

 

[harleyman]

Hey Noddy.. You have a fantastic card for FSX now in the 8800GTX..


The only real advantage would be a little more memory in the 285 - 295..But I don't think it would be worth the expensive ..


I'm not sure that a newer card would fit the Dell case ...

 

[Bjoern]

There's definately a performance difference between an 8800GTX and GTX285.

If you run very high resolutions (1920*1650 and more) with high AA/AF settings, the GTX295 might be worth to take a look at.

If not, go for the GTX285. The smaller GPU (55nm instead of 65nm) alone is worth the money, since it runs cooler and consumes less energy than its predecessor.


Harleyman, if he can fit a 8800 into his case, he won't have problems with a GTX280.

 

[noddy]

Thanks guys, will have a think on what do.

Next thing I guess will be Windows 7 or to stick with Vista. How easy would it be to bump up to 64bit Vista and increase the RAM to 8GB (Max for the 720) and again are there any major benefits in doing this?

Sorry for the dumb questions but just thinking on the best options without forking huge amounts of cash for a new PC.

 

[harleyman]

There's definately a performance difference between an 8800GTX and GTX285.

If you run very high resolutions (1920*1650 and more) with high AA/AF settings, the GTX295 might be worth to take a look at.

If not, go for the GTX285. The smaller GPU (55nm instead of 65nm) alone is worth the money, since it runs cooler and consumes less energy than its predecessor.


Harleyman, if he can fit a 8800 into his case, he won't have problems with a GTX280.

Hes not refering to a 280...His question was a 285 - 295 (not sure about size difference in them)

Even if it fits I disagree on it as to actual performance gains vs dollar...

FSX will not benefit from a duel card anyways....

FSx cares more about your CPU than GPU for sure...


Going to Vista 64 is easy..If you use the purchase program that can be a pain, but not to big a deal..Adding more ram is as easy as installing it..You will need the same type and speed though...


Keep in mind that some motherboards struggle with all their ram dimms full, as it stresses the controller some....

 

[Bjoern]

Next thing I guess will be Windows 7 or to stick with Vista. How easy would it be to bump up to 64bit Vista and increase the RAM to 8GB (Max for the 720) and again are there any major benefits in doing this?

You'd be better off with 3*2GB Ram, since it enables the I7 to use triple channel mode for memory, which gives a small performance boost.

Hes not refering to a 280...His question was a 285 - 295 (not sure about size difference in them)

My bad, that "0" should have actually been a "5".

Even if it fits I disagree on it as to actual performance gains vs dollar...

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=127124

If he has the money...why not?

FSX will not benefit from a duel card anyways....

No one will benefit from duel cards anyways. All that "You, me out front!", "En garde" and "Tomorrow at dawn in front of the CPU cooler" blaffing from the case as well as the sword and pistol sounds...no, thanks!

:d

FSx cares more about your CPU than GPU for sure...

Well, I doubt this 285 will be for FSX only.

 

[harleyman]

Reviews and charts are all well enough...

But I still debate a need for a card as the 285 or 295 for FSX....

FSX still wants your CPU for breakfast....

Even have a guy here with a single 6600 card with fine graphice on 2 gigs ram... But hes got the CPU horsepower...



He has great cards..Just don't see much gains in the graphice department for dollars spent..Thats my only point.....

For that money go to X58 and the i7 020 ....IMO (costs more ..I know)

 

[David_L6]

You'd be better off with 3*2GB Ram, since it enables the I7 to use triple channel mode for memory, which gives a small performance boost.

He doesn't have a Core i7.

 

[David_L6]

.....increase the RAM to 8GB (Max for the 720) and again are there any major benefits in doing this?

Major benefits? No. I went from 4GB to 8GB of RAM on my Vista 64 bit computer and I couldn't tell that it made any difference. Maybe I'm just not perceptive enough to notice tiny differences.......

 

[harleyman]

Major benefits? No. I went from 4GB to 8GB of RAM on my Vista 64 bit computer and I couldn't tell that it made any difference. Maybe I'm just not perceptive enough to notice tiny differences.......

No you are correct David_L6...it will show YOU as the user not any noticable difference i believe.. It will just flow thru its processes easier..IMO

 

[Bjoern]

He doesn't have a Core i7.

Whoops, had my head in another thread.

But I still debate a need for a card as the 285 or 295 for FSX....

I agree when it comes to FSX *only*, but just about every other current game out there (except GTA4) needs power in the GFX department.

The 8800 series reminds me a bit of the F-4...a brick with enough power to break Mach 2.

In terms of efficiency, a 285 would really be money well spent. If the numbers are right, it's a difference of maybe 50W between a 8800GTX and a GTX285 at full power...

 

[harleyman]

Well from what I've read everything but FSX will rock with a 285 or 295...You are correct on that for sure....:ernae:

FSX just can't use the two GPU's in those cards well.. Hell.. Not until FSX SP 1 did we get multicore help..LOL



My card is a multi GPU and it has oddities for sure..Expecially with FS9...wow...

 

[Alexraptor]

I think the 285 will be fine for any title out there.
The 295 i think is more of a bragging rights card or if you want ultra insane antialiasing.

 

[harleyman]

I think the 285 will be fine for any title out there.
The 295 i think is more of a bragging rights card or if you want ultra insane antialiasing.

I totally agree.... But its overkill for FSX... But still a great card no doubt about....

But hes intrested in knowing if a purchase as that card will give him big performance increase over his 8800GTX card...



But if ya got it..Spend it..it sure won't hurt a thing...LOL

 

[BananaBob]

I went from an 8800GTS 640mb to the 285 1GB and have noticed a big improvement in other games, especially Crysis Warhead, COD WAW, and Fallout 3 but on the other hand, moving from the Duo Core to the i7 was the big one for FSX, because like said above, FSX loves the clocks.

 

[kilo delta]

I currently have dual 8800GTX 768 mb, and wonder if there would big gains in FSX by changing to either the 285 or 295?

My systems specs are:-

Dell 720 H2C
Intel QX 6850 clocked to 3.33Ghz
Vista Ulitmate 32 Bit
4GB of Ram - 800Mhz DDR2

Put simply....no.
What you could do,though, is push the QX6850 chip up to ~3.8ghz which will give you a fps increase. It should be a simple matter of increasing the multi in the bios (you may need to increase the cpu voltage slightly). The 720 H2C has pretty adequate cooling so temps should be fine.
Another option would be to change the memory for faster modules (~1200mhz)

 

[Ark]

285.

You won't see a benefit from the 295.

 

[Bjoern]

FSX just can't use the two GPU's in those cards well.. Hell.. Not until FSX SP 1 did we get multicore help..LOL

The GTX285 is a pure single GPU card.

 

[stansdds]

Flight sims are CPU intensive, you are likely to see a bigger benefit with a faster CPU.

 

[kilo delta]

Flight sims are CPU intensive, you are likely to see a bigger benefit with a faster CPU.

Not needed...just overclock the original chip a little more. I had my qx6850 at 4ghz, only reason I went with the 45nm quad QX chips was for the lower temps.