• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

One Ugly Looking PBJ (Navy B-25)

Kinda cool pics, different. I thought the Doolittle Mitchells were the only carrier launched Mitchells. Your first pic is on a carrier if I'm not mistaken. So, to anyone's knowledge, were there more launches off of carriers by the bomber.

Matt
 
Sometimes carriers were just used to transport aircraft from one area or another. Manila Bay was a small escort carrier so it was most likely to just transport the PBJs.
 
Sometimes carriers were just used to transport aircraft from one area or another. Manila Bay was a small escort carrier so it was most likely to just transport the PBJs.

Yes, the original location said they were being transported to a base in the Pacific, but when I first saw the photo I had the same thought strykerpsg, particularly with the running engines. I guess the crews were just running/maintaining them.

Here's a photo album (some interesting photos) for Marine Squadron Six-Twelve that flew a solid nosed version: http://www.vmb612.com/photographs.htm

View attachment 51197
 
Yeah, thought about the smaller ferrying carriers too. Just wanted to make sure I didn't miss something from the past regarding what I consider one of the best medium bombers of the war. Thanks for sharing some lost history.

Matt
 
On the right side of the picture there is what appears to be a B-26 with a tarp over its right engine.
 
Looks like they kept the nose glass in place when they mounted the radome. Just painted over the glass or left it clear.
 
You are not wrong, that is one ugly looking aircraft; I thought we had some doozies on this side of the Atlantic (the Turbinlite Bostons, the Short Sturgeon) but that PBJ has to be the winner!

View attachment 51232
 
You are not wrong, that is one ugly looking aircraft; I thought we had some doozies on this side of the Atlantic (the Turbinlite Bostons, the Short Sturgeon) but that PBJ has to be the winner!

View attachment 51232
I always liked the Turbinlite Bostons! I have a question about them, Why did they change the windscreens? The conversion kit I got (for a 1/48th scale model) had a different windscreen that was a little less sloped than the original. I looked in all the references I culd find and there was no reference to it.

Dave
 
I always liked the Turbinlite Bostons! I have a question about them, Why did they change the windscreens? The conversion kit I got (for a 1/48th scale model) had a different windscreen that was a little less sloped than the original. I looked in all the references I culd find and there was no reference to it.

Dave

Dave,

Don't know for sure, but this answer makes sense to me ......

As well as the Bostons ordered direct for the RAF, a substantial number of Havocs from French contracts were diverted to Britain. I suspect that your conversion kit was for a Havoc Turbinlite, rather than a Boston; I do know that 23 Squadron had some Havocs on strength, for night intruder work, so it kinda makes sense.
 
Back
Top