Francois
FS Veteran
... since they are being used by ever more professional outfits: http://www.aopa.org/members/files/pilot/2013/april/f_jay.html AOPA and EEA have recognized this too... see article !
-
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
P3D and FSX NOT dead
- Thread starter Francois
- Start date
Clutch Cargo
Members +
Good find. It shows why LM did not include a "front end", so the aviation companies can create their own for their particular needs/market.
CG_1976
Ret. US Coastie/RCAF
Excellent. So who agress with me that MS fumbled and LM picked up for a TD.
They got more then a TD, they also got a body check with a stick in the jewels applied to MS.
Its great to see P3 taking the time and care to refine this monster of a simulator. The sim is HUGE and needed some tweaking. They are also bringing it to the next level.
I think Microsoft (personal views) were making some bad decisions at the time and by launching FSX ahead of time really messed things up. LM is doing an awesome job with it.
Smooth frames are golden...
I think Microsoft (personal views) were making some bad decisions at the time and by launching FSX ahead of time really messed things up. LM is doing an awesome job with it.
Smooth frames are golden...
Navy Chief
Senior Member
The "Jay" looks like a cool machine, but for just a little more, you can have this:
<strong><em>
Now, if all these clever brains improving the sim via P3D could maybe throw us NavAir fans a bone and tweak the Acceleration carrier ops parameters so the sim works as well with tail-dragger props as it does with tricycle-gear jets, that would be a nice improvement. Anybody at Lockheed-Martin wanna give it a shot? My FSX flight deck officers are getting a bit tired of me tearing up their deck planking with my prop when I catch a wire and nose over.
Navy Chief
Senior Member
Now, if all these clever brains improving the sim via P3D could maybe throw us NavAir fans a bone and tweak the Acceleration carrier ops parameters so the sim works as well with tail-dragger props as it does with tricycle-gear jets, that would be a nice improvement. Anybody at Lockheed-Martin wanna give it a shot? My FSX flight deck officers are getting a bit tired of me tearing up their deck planking with my prop when I catch a wire and nose over.
and figure out a way to have a animated (moving) arresting wire...:salute: NC
Hell I would settle for a carrier that does not leave me behind after I land
Still hats off to Aces... the team themselves created a sim with long legs. Heck the carrier did not even make it in the initial beta. After some cajoling... they got it in by the next beta. A moving carrier... then came Acceleration. In 2 years this sim will be a decade old.
Excellent work.... and looking forward to what LM has in mind for the next version.
Remember LM.... I am your man for carrier beta testing... I kept the dream alive!
Still hats off to Aces... the team themselves created a sim with long legs. Heck the carrier did not even make it in the initial beta. After some cajoling... they got it in by the next beta. A moving carrier... then came Acceleration. In 2 years this sim will be a decade old.
Excellent work.... and looking forward to what LM has in mind for the next version.
Remember LM.... I am your man for carrier beta testing... I kept the dream alive!