• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

RA Spitfire, opinions?

T

tracyq144

Charter Member
First had this in FS9, now in FSX. No regrets, I really like it, but...

I just wonder what other's opinions on the flight model are? Between never even seeing one in real life, flying a Spit in Il-2 and BoB, and the RA model, I just wonder which is close to reality, or if none of them are.

Specifically, the MK9 model.
 
I've never flown a spit but I think the RA spitfire is one of the nicest addon's for FSX! I love the way it handles what a sportscar with wings should fly like, my opinion.
 
It is an excellent aircraft for FSX, even if it is too shiny. :engel016:

I'm finding it to look aged now though. It has been around for a while. However, it remains in my hangar while others have fallen into storage. :ernae:
 
I've stolen the following passage from their website, and it's no hype. Rob's airfiles are well respected through out the industry.

Rob Young spent 25 years as a professional musician before turning to simulation. He has designed flight aerodynamics for many of the major flight simulator developers. He designed the flight models for Fly! II on behalf of Terminal Reality and since changing his focus to Microsoft Flight Simulator has designed the aerodynamics for a diverse group of developers including Lago, JustFlight, Eaglesoft, and MAAM-Sim, picking up awards for nearly every aircraft he has co-designed.
Click to expand...
 
Personally, I prefer A2A's Mk.1, but that doesn't stop me thinking the RAS IX and XIV are superb models as well.
 
I love the RA Spitfire. I'm no flight model expert but to me it flies well and it has additional models that A2A doesn't. However that's not to knock the A2A Spit - I love that one too.

From my perspective the RA Spit has great exterior modeling and a good rendition of a pilot. The cockpit is well done too but I think the A2A Spit's cockpit is a bit better rendered. Just my personal opinion. But I highly recommend the RA Spit.
 
I had the pleasure of meeting Mr Young a few weeks ago, TBH, I did not know he was a Brit! but I have been a fan of his for years.

To me, the RealAir Spit is one of the finest aircraft to fly in MSFS, if I have been flying something a little 'iffy' I go and fly some circuits in the Spit, on the numbers with a perfect three pointer at the end.
VERY satisfying.
If Rob has done the flight model, you know it will fly as much like the real thing as a PC will allow.
 
I had the fs9 version and i also have the fsx version, its a must buy for me, i personally love every aspect, the sounds, FM, and model are all very believable for me.
 
deimos256 said:
I had the fs9 version and i also have the fsx version, its a must buy for me, i personally love every aspect, the sounds, FM, and model are all very believable for me.
Click to expand...


I agree fully - it would take an A2A version with Accusim to drag me away from the RA Spit
 
I love the way this plane comes with an excellent paintkit, and is so easy to paint. However, I've sat in a couple of Spitfires myself, and RA Spit's VC is magnificently rendered, but a little on the simplistic side, and I know that the Mark IX does have a manual radiator flap lever, like A2A's, but unlike RA's which has automatic radiator flaps???
 
It's still a great buy. I've also had it since FS9, and it was the first FSX-native addon I ever bought. I've never really taken to their Mk IX for various reasons, but the Mk XIV is a great-looking, great sounding and exhilarating ride.
 
I have both the A2A and the RA, and the RA is the best IMO. If you like mid to late mark spitfires this is for you, my only concern is the interconnected throttle and prop control is not correct. RA says "theres nothing we can do about it" other than that it runs great. The A2A solo spitfire is the best bargain I have ever seen for that quality of software. Get them both. :jump:
 
I always liked this version and this paint, masquerading as a Mk XIX. Ironically, the real XIX this was based on is now painted as a Mk XIV and has lost the contra-prop. Not in my world though!
 
The RA Spitfire is indeed an awesome package and well worth the money. The only thing not completely to my liking is the sound which I've partly replaced with Bradburger's Griffon sounds available here at SOH. It's not at all that the sound is bad just a matter of taste but I do like the ambient engine sounds included with the package.
 
SpaceWeevil said:
I always liked this version and this paint, masquerading as a Mk XIX. Ironically, the real XIX this was based on is now painted as a Mk XIV and has lost the contra-prop. Not in my world though!
Click to expand...

Hey, I'vr repainted the 5-bladeprop version of this plane, will upload it some time.
 
Nick C said:
I'd forgotten about Ian's review...duh!
Click to expand...

Nice review, indeed.

Yes, I guess the reason I asked in the first place was that it does seem easy to fly, and the BoB Spitfire is definitely NOT!, at least for me, the last time I tried it, anyway.

Funny how flight models can differ so much for the same aircraft.
 
The Spitfire has been described many times as an absolutely beautiful aircraft to fly. Landing? That's a different matter, as the long nose makes approaches hard due to lack of visibility (hence the gently curved "Spitfire approach" and the narrow track undercarriage can make life hard too, particularly on rough surfaces.

Overall, though, most period and modern pilots seem to absolutely adore the type, regardless of which variant they have flown.

I think I'd agree with those that say that the XIV is probably the better of the two in the RAS pack, although sentimentally, I will always go for Merlins over Griffons. I'd still stand by the findings of that review though, and recommend the pack to anyone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top