Thanks for the review Yoyo.
To be fair, I think it's important to be clear that the RAZBAM Harrier is challenging to fly in the VSTOL regime for reasons other than the those which make the actual jet challenging...at least in part.
The shifts in the RAZBAM FM are a bit abrupt both in transition to semi-jetbourne flight and again when the aircraft slows to a hover. These transitions and the sensitivity of the thrust axis in vertical flight make the RAZBAM jet a bit more squirrelly than the aircraft.
Of course, the actual jet has other issues which make it challenging in other ways as is generally the case in comparing FSX to real flight.
The other thing that should be pointed out is that the systems modeling in the RAZBAM model is a fair approximation of the real jet, but at a fairly basic level. The article points out that 95% of the switches work (though this number would be lower if we included MPCD functionality) but that does not necessarily mean that the switches work quite as they do in the aircraft.
In the main this doesn't make a huge difference to the average flight simmer. After all, no FSXer should be too upset that the VRS switch doesn't allow you to select between recording the HUD or the MPCD...FSX doesn't record to videotape. The fact that the velocity vector in the HUD may sit above the horizon line while the VSI is indicating a descent, however, is a bit more vexing.
None of this should stop somebody from purchasing the RAZBAM Harrier (for the sake of disclosure I am making these comments about the AV-8B model though I'd be surprised if these issues didn't carry over to the GR.7/9). But I think that those considering paying for the model, should be fairly advised on what they are getting for their $40.
I apologize if I have misinterpreted something from the original review. I confess that my Polish (or Google's for that matter) is nowhere as good as Yoyo's English.
Deacon
To be fair, I think it's important to be clear that the RAZBAM Harrier is challenging to fly in the VSTOL regime for reasons other than the those which make the actual jet challenging...at least in part.
The shifts in the RAZBAM FM are a bit abrupt both in transition to semi-jetbourne flight and again when the aircraft slows to a hover. These transitions and the sensitivity of the thrust axis in vertical flight make the RAZBAM jet a bit more squirrelly than the aircraft.
Of course, the actual jet has other issues which make it challenging in other ways as is generally the case in comparing FSX to real flight.
The other thing that should be pointed out is that the systems modeling in the RAZBAM model is a fair approximation of the real jet, but at a fairly basic level. The article points out that 95% of the switches work (though this number would be lower if we included MPCD functionality) but that does not necessarily mean that the switches work quite as they do in the aircraft.
In the main this doesn't make a huge difference to the average flight simmer. After all, no FSXer should be too upset that the VRS switch doesn't allow you to select between recording the HUD or the MPCD...FSX doesn't record to videotape. The fact that the velocity vector in the HUD may sit above the horizon line while the VSI is indicating a descent, however, is a bit more vexing.
None of this should stop somebody from purchasing the RAZBAM Harrier (for the sake of disclosure I am making these comments about the AV-8B model though I'd be surprised if these issues didn't carry over to the GR.7/9). But I think that those considering paying for the model, should be fairly advised on what they are getting for their $40.
I apologize if I have misinterpreted something from the original review. I confess that my Polish (or Google's for that matter) is nowhere as good as Yoyo's English.
Deacon