I belong to a small group of writers who gather weekly to critique one another's work (and drink, but that's another story). One of the hardest things to do is to explain to a fellow writer who poured his or her guts out that the story just isn't finished or needs a major rewrite. It's especially tough when you know that the story in question is a thinly veiled account of their own life. "Yes, I see that the main character is devastated over the death of her mother... but I'm just not sure that I believe it." Talk about dancing on thin ice...
What we've put into standard practice is the "feedback sandwich". It goes like this: start with something positive (there's always something good you can say if you dig deeply enough). Then lay out any misgivings you have or suggest things that could be changed. Finally, reinforce your faith in the writer and your enthusiasm for their efforts.
Whether you write, paint, do airbrush art on the side of vans, or build simulated airplanes, this is the kind of feedback you want, trust me. To give criticism is to indicate you're invested in the outcome. I don't know about anyone else, but I wouldn't take the time to comment on a piece of work unless I either liked it or thought it could be improved. Either way, the point is to keep the author motivated to constantly improve, not to quit in frustration.
Of course, there are a few people who can only feel good about themselves by dragging others down into the muck for a good wrestle. Seems like they'd be happier doing something else besides poisoning our tiny well... might I suggest a career as a TV pundit instead?
What we've put into standard practice is the "feedback sandwich". It goes like this: start with something positive (there's always something good you can say if you dig deeply enough). Then lay out any misgivings you have or suggest things that could be changed. Finally, reinforce your faith in the writer and your enthusiasm for their efforts.
Whether you write, paint, do airbrush art on the side of vans, or build simulated airplanes, this is the kind of feedback you want, trust me. To give criticism is to indicate you're invested in the outcome. I don't know about anyone else, but I wouldn't take the time to comment on a piece of work unless I either liked it or thought it could be improved. Either way, the point is to keep the author motivated to constantly improve, not to quit in frustration.
Of course, there are a few people who can only feel good about themselves by dragging others down into the muck for a good wrestle. Seems like they'd be happier doing something else besides poisoning our tiny well... might I suggest a career as a TV pundit instead?
I thoroughly agree. Unfortunately, the forums are full of clueless jerks who have no concept of respect for one's efforts or civility. I have been a moderator on internet forums, and have been absolutely appalled by some people's posts! Constructive criticisim is one thing; being downright rude is something else. All we can do is consider the source and move on. I'll say one thing about SOH... 99% of the folks posting here are polite and demonstrate respect and encouragement to the developers. This is still the best FS forum on the net!
