-
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
Sometimes I hate FSX and sometimes I love it.
- Thread starter huub vink
- Start date
Ferry_vO
Retired SOH Administrator
Flying a Butcher bird will make most of us in here happy, Huub!
As for my love/hate affair with FsX; I'm still tweaking to get the best performance out of my new system. If I lock the framerate slider to 20 fps I barely get 13 fps no matter what settings. If I set it to unlimited I can get up to 100 fps but I get a lot of stutters and artifacts on the screen while panning around. Now I've set it too 31 fps and it seems quite stable at the moment.
Sometimes I think that Fsx will never run smooth on any computer as it cannot handle the newer processors and videocards well, but there isn't an 'older' system fast enough to run it properly...
As for my love/hate affair with FsX; I'm still tweaking to get the best performance out of my new system. If I lock the framerate slider to 20 fps I barely get 13 fps no matter what settings. If I set it to unlimited I can get up to 100 fps but I get a lot of stutters and artifacts on the screen while panning around. Now I've set it too 31 fps and it seems quite stable at the moment.
Sometimes I think that Fsx will never run smooth on any computer as it cannot handle the newer processors and videocards well, but there isn't an 'older' system fast enough to run it properly...
grunau_baby
SOH-CM-2025
Ferry,
have you tried the bufferpools setting in the cfg? I´s the only cfg tweak I use and it works great, minimized my stutters completely.
Just add:
[BUFFERPOOLS]
Poolsize=300000000
to your cfg. I use a very high value, if I go any higher FSX completely freezes, lower is less efficient. I guess every system has it´s own balance. You have to set your framrates to unlimited, to use the tweak!
With this settings I was finally able to push up the autogen and use traffic, too.
Alex
have you tried the bufferpools setting in the cfg? I´s the only cfg tweak I use and it works great, minimized my stutters completely.
Just add:
[BUFFERPOOLS]
Poolsize=300000000
to your cfg. I use a very high value, if I go any higher FSX completely freezes, lower is less efficient. I guess every system has it´s own balance. You have to set your framrates to unlimited, to use the tweak!
With this settings I was finally able to push up the autogen and use traffic, too.
Alex
Ferry_vO
Retired SOH Administrator
I tried you suggestion Alex, but it didn't change anything. With the framerate set to unlimited the rate fluctuates between 15 and 70 with severe stutters and artifacts on the screen. With the slider set to 30 it is almost fluent and stable with very minor stutters. Lock it to 20 and the framerate drops to 13-15.
Yep; tried to lock it at 30 with the tweak but could hardly get over 10-12 fps (Aerosoft F-16). With the tweak removed I get 25 fps with the same aircraft.
Yep; tried to lock it at 30 with the tweak but could hardly get over 10-12 fps (Aerosoft F-16). With the tweak removed I get 25 fps with the same aircraft.
Yea, I would too with scenery like that. . . .geeeze, nobody likes a showoff jankees, lol, lol.
Tim-HH
SOH-CM-2023
But the good thing is that you always forget the frustrating moments when you really enjoy it
View attachment 12463
Greetings
Tim
View attachment 12463
Greetings
Tim
D
dhl1986
Guest
I enjoy it all the time, and sometimes even a bit more...
Wow.
Imagine flight simulators of the future, when satellite imaging will more than likely make detail like this the norm for every spot on the globe.
Im stuck bwteen two sims ..love FS9 with the variety of scenery and aircraft, fast frame rates, the amount of AI I can load without bogging the system down..but also like FSX for the very nice a/c (ie L-39) and the detailed phto real scenery ..conversly I hate FSX the way it treats the NZ landscape (ie desert like ) and the FPS which struggles on my system. Maybe when the desert is banished from NZ and I get an upgrade I wil delete FS9.
txnetcop
Charter Member
Yes there have been bad days with FSX but they have been so few in the last two years that I just love it. Build your computer right the first time and quick tweaking evey time someone comes up with a new idea that makes FSX run at "100fps everywhere." I learned that once you have it just like you want it, leave it there. FSX is an odd bird, but fun! However, GW3 and Silver Wings will never leave my PC no matter how great FSX gets.
Naki I also am looking forward to more time and effort spent on NZ and the islands in general. If you haven't already experienced it, FTX/Orbx has done some awesome things that are worth every $.
Ted
Naki I also am looking forward to more time and effort spent on NZ and the islands in general. If you haven't already experienced it, FTX/Orbx has done some awesome things that are worth every $.
Ted
Cazzie
SOH-CM-2024
Huub,
I have found that the sim just performs flawlessly in extreme rural areas, even with REX, UTX, GEX, and FSGenesis mesh. But get around a crowded area with lots of traffic and boom, cartoon-land!
So until I can get a beast to power the sim, it's strictly rural flying for me. The Alps are grand, do very little to the sim, but watch Geneva.
But FS9, man I can go anywhere I choose, New York City, yeah! Constant and steady fps, even in FRAPS. Greatest sim ever, still.
But I can't say anything bad about FSX, it performs better than I thought it would on my mid-range system by today's standards. I guess it like that line in Bowie's song, "When it's good, it's really good and when it's bad, it really pleases!"
Caz
I have found that the sim just performs flawlessly in extreme rural areas, even with REX, UTX, GEX, and FSGenesis mesh. But get around a crowded area with lots of traffic and boom, cartoon-land!
So until I can get a beast to power the sim, it's strictly rural flying for me. The Alps are grand, do very little to the sim, but watch Geneva.
But FS9, man I can go anywhere I choose, New York City, yeah! Constant and steady fps, even in FRAPS. Greatest sim ever, still.
But I can't say anything bad about FSX, it performs better than I thought it would on my mid-range system by today's standards. I guess it like that line in Bowie's song, "When it's good, it's really good and when it's bad, it really pleases!"
Caz