DagR
Charter Member
There's no VAS problems with the F-104G. I talked about the F-84F and Tornado.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
SSW F84-F Thunderstreak ("The Hog") ready for the sky.
- Thread starter PLUTO16
- Start date
There's no VAS problems with the F-104G. I talked about the F-84F and Tornado.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I have F84 and Tornado too. In fact we flew a couple of days ago a COMAO vs agressors, with 20 pilots most of them Tornado. Any problem at all
It is true that both planes are high RAM demanding models, however they can be used safely provided that you don't overhelm the VAS ( Virtual address space) with a lot of other addons such as Rex HD, heavy ORBX settings and so on
Most of VAS is consumed by texturesm that are static. Once loaded they don't grow nor shrink into the VAS. You are telling that your OOM is after a while. Model and Dlls also consume dinamically but really few. Other addons as weather programs or ORBX are really using VAS dinamically, making a bog toss.
I attach some pictures showing how much VAS Tornado and F84 are consuming, both in solo model, the heaviest load. ubunto models are about 200 mb less
ORBX installed, photorreal textures, 2 m/pix, airports ar 1mt/pix, pictures at runway threshold
Using ProcessExplorer to check VAS usage
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0ffeh7pvg6u1s5i/vas_f84f_solo.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/lyzv5ydmgblbqj1/vas_tornado_solo.png?dl=0
It is true that both planes are high RAM demanding models, however they can be used safely provided that you don't overhelm the VAS ( Virtual address space) with a lot of other addons such as Rex HD, heavy ORBX settings and so on
Most of VAS is consumed by texturesm that are static. Once loaded they don't grow nor shrink into the VAS. You are telling that your OOM is after a while. Model and Dlls also consume dinamically but really few. Other addons as weather programs or ORBX are really using VAS dinamically, making a bog toss.
I attach some pictures showing how much VAS Tornado and F84 are consuming, both in solo model, the heaviest load. ubunto models are about 200 mb less
ORBX installed, photorreal textures, 2 m/pix, airports ar 1mt/pix, pictures at runway threshold
Using ProcessExplorer to check VAS usage
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0ffeh7pvg6u1s5i/vas_f84f_solo.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/lyzv5ydmgblbqj1/vas_tornado_solo.png?dl=0