H
hinch
Guest
http://www.suprunovdesign.ru/sdf_cat1_vampire.htm
Looks like a good model and it should have some systems.
Looks like a good model and it should have some systems.
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
This is sacrilege! LOL The exterior looks great though, too bad
Not sure what you're complaining about - 25$ for a good plane is not that much. Sure it lacks a VC (beeing the reason why I won't buy it) but if you look at other VCless offerings (like DA Fokker) this is not bad at all. And from the makers of the Yak-40 you can expect a lot of depth.
$25 for a plane with no VC?
I won't even download freeware planes with no VC!
It's 2009, people.
This is kind of a funny reply Oli. . .you ask what people are complaining about and then admit yourself that you won't buy it because it lacks a VC. . . .ummm that's what they're complaining about, lol.Not sure what you're complaining about - 25$ for a good plane is not that much. Sure it lacks a VC (being the reason why I won't buy it) but if you look at other VClass offerings (like DA Fokker) this is not bad at all. And from the makers of the Yak-40 you can expect a lot of depth.
$25 for a plane with no VC?
I won't even download freeware planes with no VC!
It's 2009, people.