• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

Team L1049 FSX Native Constellations???

tommieboy

tommieboy

SOH-CM-2025
What ever happened to this project? I've got their FS9 birds and they look good except for the typical messed up prop / cloud deal in FSX Acceleration.

Tommy
 
Have been flying the rivets off of all of them - in FSX/Accel - since they came out. You just need to swap another good 3 blade prop blur texture that looks good in FSX and they all work fine (for me) in FSX.
 
I have a really nice one I stumbled across years ago - no idea where from - works well for all the 3-blade Calclassics (C240/340, DC-6, all the Connies, etc.)

I'm travelling in Asia at the moment - when I return, (Thurs 8 Nov) if you haven't got one still one, I'll send it to you.

I posted (but never heard back) on Calclassics regarding a similar file for the 4-props ... their new DC-7C would be really nice with an improved prop. Agree with Expat, most of their planes (at least the aforementioned, haven't tried the B377/KC-97 in FSX) is very nice in FSX, notwithstanding how far back some of those models go back, and that they were initially intend for FS9.

Of all of them, the Connies work the best.

DL
 
I'm not able to get the DC-6 to fly or even show up in my FSX aircraft when selecting my plane. any help?
 
I have started to created my own prop textures for these Connies, so I'm OK in that department. I was just wondering what ever happened to the FSX native versions of these birds that the someone on Team L1049 had made mention of a long time ago. I guess that project never happened?

Tommy
 
Had we but RAM enough, and time,
This suggestion, sir, would be NO crime.


As the poet said. It's true, we have been thinking about it, and maybe something will come of it. However, for reasons of sanity I am doing one project at a time only, and the current one has two engines, one oversize fin, and is a really ugly goon. Anyway it'll have to come first.

Manfred
 
mjahn said:
Had we but RAM enough, and time,
This suggestion, sir, would be NO crime.


As the poet said. It's true, we have been thinking about it, and maybe something will come of it. However, for reasons of sanity I am doing one project at a time only, and the current one has two engines, one oversize fin, and is a really ugly goon. Anyway it'll have to come first.

Manfred
Click to expand...

Gute Antwort Manfred

As a former member of the L team,all I can say that still the L's(049-1649) fly well in FSX with decent frame rates*.Apart bump map's&shadows I see little improvement in a new native one apart the huge task to make a new (seperated model) VC

And still the gauges life up to redent DC-6B payware,belive me

Still I understand the dream's

Roland
aka
thunder100

*35 FPS like best new payware
 
Thanks for the responses / clarifications everyone.

I'll move forward on my alternate FSX Acceleration prop textures for these birds and post them on avsim when I'm done. They won't solve the prop / cloud issue, but still, I think some will find them useful.

Tommy
 
mjahn said:
Had we but RAM enough, and time,
This suggestion, sir, would be NO crime.


As the poet said. It's true, we have been thinking about it, and maybe something will come of it. However, for reasons of sanity I am doing one project at a time only, and the current one has two engines, one oversize fin, and is a really ugly goon. Anyway it'll have to come first.

Manfred
Click to expand...

I know it's getting OT ... but you're not talking about a redone C-46, are you ... 'cause that would be oh so sweet .... Mind you, those clues could just as easily take us to a Martin 404 .... hmmmmm .... :sheep:


DL
 
Manfred, just want to mention to you and the other Connie team members what absolute treasures these planes are and what a generous contribution to the community of some of the very best freeware. I fly often e.g. the 749, 1049, 1649 and Willy Victors and you should know each time I do I think of the many hours and effort it must have taken to achieve what you all did.:salute:
 
Many thanks, much appreciated by me and all team members, past and present. I'll check with them, perhaps a quick and dirty conversion is feasible after all...
 
I wasn't fishing (at least this time) !! Seriously, I had seen and thought from the CalClassics forum there might be another (FS9) for the Starliner down the road, which would be more than welcome. I have so many ports in FSX and good fps with the Connies, I honestly don't think it is worth all the time to duplicate these for FSX. What I enjoy, in addition to the huge nostalgia, is all the flight profile and engine management "plate spinnng" that keep's one on their toes and also marvel at all the functionality you guys achieved. It also is educational to practice, read and learn how aircraft and airlines of this era operated, and so differently than they do today.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top