Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
Not Einstein but an American, Dr. Alan Guth. Do I get a brownie?Awesome.....
One of Einsteins neat theories...
Bill
Not Einstein but an American, Dr. Alan Guth. Do I get a brownie?
Moreover, consider this point. Until the "local photon" is examined, nothing about it is known. The same holds true of the "remote photon." So, given these constraints, how does one detect whether the "remote photon" has actually changed state?Another DM science fail. This article makes a number of basic errors which betray total ignorance of the subject. For instance, 'quantum teleportation' has nothing at all to do with teleportation in the usual sense but is a specialist term from quantum information theory. And nothing at all was 'teleported' in this experiment - a type of quantum information is all that bridged the gap. Sensationalising highly technical papers like this does nobody any good, and certainly does science a disservice.

I used to think 'transporting' would be great when I was younger. Beam anywhere.
But now that I've gotten older, the implications associated with having your body disassembled, your atoms scattered, and then hopefully have your body re-assembled in the proper order.
What about your soul?
I don't think I'd trust any computer hardware or software to get it right, yet.
I'm starting to side with the Doctor more and more on this one.
View attachment 70635![]()
The only truly intelligent and cogent comment made thus far is this one, with which I fully concur:
Another DM science fail. This article makes a number of basic errors which betray total ignorance of the subject. For instance, 'quantum teleportation' has nothing at all to do with teleportation in the usual sense but is a specialist term from quantum information theory. And nothing at all was 'teleported' in this experiment - a type of quantum information is all that bridged the gap. Sensationalising highly technical papers like this does nobody any good, and certainly does science a disservice.
Moreover, consider this point. Until the "local photon" is examined, nothing about it is known. The same holds true of the "remote photon." So, given these constraints, how does one detect whether the "remote photon" has actually changed state?
As soon as the "remote photon's" state is observed (we need to detect a change, remember?), that photon's state instantly changes again!![]()
I used to think 'transporting' would be great when I was younger. Beam anywhere.
But now that I've gotten older, the implications associated with having your body disassembled, your atoms scattered, and then hopefully have your body re-assembled in the proper order.
What about your soul?
I don't think I'd trust any computer hardware or software to get it right, yet.
I'm starting to side with the Doctor more and more on this one.
View attachment 70635![]()