The Ongoing Mystery Aircraft Thread Part Deux.

Thnak you Kevin

How about this little fellow getting juiced up for the next trip.
Note the tweedy gentleman on the right having a quiet fag..... let's hope the wind is in the right direction..:redfire:
 

Attachments

  • Fillup.jpg
    Fillup.jpg
    55.7 KB · Views: 62
Indeed, Mike, but it's not a Caudron. Small production run of 30 of these machines. I have been kind enough to leave a small clue.
 
The only other machine that immediately comes to mind, with a similar tail fin and rudder, is the pre-war version of the Leopoldoff L.3 - however the wing struts don't seem to be right for that. But then, I'm probably barking up the wrong tree, countrywise. I wish that I could read the faint script on the vertical tail surfaces!
 
If you look closely enough on the rudder, Mike, you will see a faint 'L-3'. I only removed the reg, F-ANRX, which is the prototype Léopoldoff Colibri. Well worked out - over to France :icon29:
 
If you look closely enough on the rudder, Mike, you will see a faint 'L-3'. I only removed the reg, F-ANRX, which is the prototype Léopoldoff Colibri. Well worked out - over to France :icon29:

Would you be kind enough to explain why most references, including AviaFrance, spell it Leopoldoff- my photo is from a French publication, L'Aviation Civile Française, which insists on the acute. Is it optional ?
 
If you look closely enough on the rudder, Mike, you will see a faint 'L-3'. I only removed the reg, F-ANRX, which is the prototype Léopoldoff Colibri. Well worked out - over to France :icon29:

Would you be kind enough to explain why most references, including AviaFrance, spell it Leopoldoff ? - my photo is from a French publication, L'Aviation Civile Française, which insists on the acute. Is it optional ?
 
Would you be kind enough to explain why most references, including AviaFrance, spell it Leopoldoff ? - my photo is from a French publication, L'Aviation Civile Française, which insists on the acute. Is it optional ?

Apologies for the above unattributed quote. The 'reply with quote' facility no longer seems to be operative.

I think that the answer to your question, Mike, is that Mr Leopoldoff shouldn't have an acute accent on the first 'e' of his surname because he wasn't French by birth. His forename/initials are variously given as Lev, E.T.S. and M.L.. He is said to have been born at Saratov, in Imperial Russia, in 1898; to have trained in Moscow as an aeronautical engineer; to have fought with the White Russians; to have fled to Turkey, from Odessa, when the Bolsheviks triumphed in the civil war; to have worked his way, from there, along the Mediterranean coast to Tunisia; to have travelled from North Africa, in 1923, to France, where he had family connections; and subsequently to have settled in the country (as did many White Russians, French being the lingua franca of the Russian Imperial Court). Most sources spell his surname with 'ff' at the end although I have seen it suggested, albeit rarely, that originally it ended with a 'v'. Thus it may be that in order to render his surname 'more French' he added the acute accent to the first 'e' and, possibly, substituted 'ff' for the final 'v'. If so and if he did so informally, rather than by formal means, probably it is more correct to spell his surname Leopoldoff. That is the spelling most used in my French language books and on French language websites.

Now here's something that wasn't the handiwork of Lev Leopoldoff - although this rather attractive tandem monoplane would have been flying at the same time as his pre-war Colibris.

 
Mike, even without the car registrations and the crumpled mac, I would have this as a Brit right away ! The Parnall Type 382 (Heck MkIII). A wee bit later than the Leopoldoff - 1938.
 
I strongly support that, Mike. The Flymuseum is still on my wish list!

Here is another similar looking aircraft.
 

Attachments

  • 6571B562-8046-4415-AFD0-2F7412F030CF.jpg
    6571B562-8046-4415-AFD0-2F7412F030CF.jpg
    54.3 KB · Views: 76
Back
Top