• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

The Ongoing Mystery Aircraft Thread Part Deux.

Powered by a Curtiss C-6 engine from 1928 in New York state. Was used for sightseeing. There is an Aerofiles entry for it, but no photo.
 
I think Kevin has given us enough clues - a bit of detective work will reveal the Richmond Sea Hawk from 1928 - a wee bit early for Errol Flynn.....
 
Thank you sir - new floaters always welcome. This, however, isn't a water baby. But it has enough unusual features to distinguish it from your run-of-the-mill flivver.....
 

Attachments

  • safif.jpg
    safif.jpg
    40.4 KB · Views: 15
Hi Mike:encouragement:
Although not a floater, the Garrison OM-1 Melmoth (N2MU) was capable of long (overwater) flights such as Cold Bay, Alaska to Saporo, Japan.
The OM-1 was lost in July 1982 wen a Cessna lightplane went out of control during landing and hit her.
 
Thank you Mike:encouragement:
This is a real floater. One-off and builder was 82 by the time he first flew her.
 

Attachments

  • areflo.jpg
    areflo.jpg
    122.5 KB · Views: 16
The floater is the Sea-Era by Paul H. Weston. 85hp Jabiru 2200 engine abd registration N226SE

Open House please :jump:
 
Sorry, Walter - too new for me ! Here's one that's a bit older -
 

Attachments

  • funnytail.jpg
    funnytail.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 16
I think you are on the right trail Mike. Maybe a pants-less version?
 

Attachments

  • Hennion light aircraft.jpg
    Hennion light aircraft.jpg
    46.8 KB · Views: 15
I'm assuming, Kevin, that it is the post-war Hennion, maybe after being re-engined with a Continental A65 and designated the Hennion II, which survived in North Africa until it was destroyed in, I think, a crash in 1962.

..... but on reflection, lefty's image appears to show the inverted Train engine still in place, so if it is the Hennion it must be the Hennion I and pre-1956.
 
Mike is, as ever, on the ball here - it is the Hennion 02 - F-PFOY, photographed in, I think, 1957, when it still had the Train engine - this was replaced by the Continental in '59.
She came to grief, as Mike stated, in a bean field on the outskirts of Meknes, having suffered engine failure on the descent.
Courtesy of 'Trait d'Union', May 1979.

Over to France :very_drunk:
 
Thank you, Mike. I do have something curious, but it will require a little explanation. Thus please forgive me if I don't attend to that until the morning.
 
I'll be honest. This aircraft is an ongoing mystery to me - because I don't know what it is! So if people think this inappropriate, please slap me down and move on. But if not, one of you experts out there might be able to identify it. All I know about it is that it appeared in an aviation periodical of December 1931; that it was described as an experimental light single seater built entirely on sailplane lines; and that there's a reasonable probability that it was British. The closest comparator I could find was the Camsell Monoplane, but it's not that as it didn't emerge until 1937 and differed in its engine and cabane strut arrangements.

 
Perhaps it isn't British ?

That's certainly a possibility. I made the assumption because the photograph appears in an early issue of a British aviation periodical, The Sailplane & Glider. If by the end of the day it is still stumping everyone, I'll put this one back in the 'unknown' drawer and declare open house.
 
Back
Top