• Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

  • Bandwidth Drive 2026 is over

    Thanks to everyone who donated.

The Ongoing Mystery Aircraft Thread Part Deux.

Suds for Lefty.:icon29:

Agreed, there is little information out there. I thought I came across a technical journal some time ago that explained how they launched the flying boat with little or no success but can't seem to dig it up now. It was underpowered and suffered from directional stability. Something like that.
 
Ah well, another one that vanished into obscurity.

Here's something smaller and speedier..
 

Attachments

  • weequickie.jpg
    weequickie.jpg
    68.9 KB · Views: 4
Just a note as I looked up the Cox-Klemin it should be the CK-1 not CK-2 which was a 2 seat open cockpit biplane. They labeled it wrong in Aerofiles at least the pix was.

Chris
 
Chris, you are right on the Bee Line -according to Larkins this is the BR-2.:very_drunk:

As for the Cox-Klemin - sloppy of me to copy in the wrong Aerofiles designation. It is of course the CK-1.

There was apparently another Cox-Klemin amphibian (CK-18)- are there any photos of this one?
 

Attachments

  • beeline.jpg
    beeline.jpg
    85.4 KB · Views: 4
Something more up to date.

and a pix of the CK-18 requested.

Chris
 

Attachments

  • WOTNov28.jpg
    WOTNov28.jpg
    38.7 KB · Views: 2
  • ck18-i.jpg
    ck18-i.jpg
    26.2 KB · Views: 2
Yes, I know, Uli. That's why I wrote in Australia and not from Australia ;)

And thanks by the way. :wavey:

Here is something vintage again.
 

Attachments

  • SOH-52.jpg
    SOH-52.jpg
    33.4 KB · Views: 5
One final thought on the Waco - should this not be the 10-T (Taperwing) ? The 10-W was straight, i.e. parallel, wing like most other Wacos, and those wings are certainly not parallel !
 
Back
Top