• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

The Ongoing Mystery Aircraft Thread Part Deux.

Continuing on with a highly modified bug sprayer...


jc1n6w3.jpg
 
Thanks Robert. Back in the chilly lands now.....

Try this little machine -
 

Attachments

  • wbfitm.jpg
    wbfitm.jpg
    110.2 KB · Views: 12
A long shot ..... but could that be the second Parnall Peto, G-ACOJ, which, despite being allocated that registration mark, never materialised on civvy street? The circumstantial evidence is right - G on the tail, five cylinder radial, floats, folding wings - but the wing bracing is wrong and I was unaware that this aeroplane had been photographed in civilian guise.
 
You're in the right area, Mike, but this was designed a little later than the Parnall, and purely as a civilian aircraft. You are also correct about the Armstrong-Siddeley engine, although a slightly different model.

From a well-known company.
 
Then I assume the motor to be a Genet or Genet Major and if this aeroplane postdates the Peto, my only other thought is a Blackburn Bluebird. However to postdate the Peto, it would have to be a Bluebird IV. But the fin and rudder doesn't look right for a Bluebird IV, and the only British registered floatplane version of this, of which I'm aware, was the Gipsy powered G-ABGF. The only Genet Major powered Bluebird IV, of which I'm aware, was a landplane and Australian registered, namely VH-UOC. The photograph looks much more like a Genet powered Bluebird II. The only floatplane version of this, of which I'm aware, was G-EBSW. But this aeroplane dates from 1927 (although it was not converted to a floatplane until 1930), whereas the two Petos apparently date from 1929/30, and in the photographs of G-EBSW which I've seen the engine mounting and cowling look subtly different from that in the photograph posted. All considered, Mike, I think that I've confused myself to the point of giving in and running up the white flag!
 
You didn't confuse yourself, my dear fellow - I did it for you. For some reason I had the Peto much earlier, which was wrong - my apologies.

This is indeed G-EBSW, the Bluebird II. This is the original with wooden prop, which was subsequently changed to a Fairey Reed metal airscrew. This may explain the different appearance to some extent.

No white flag necessary, only a tribute of sackcloth, ashes, and a glass of poncha from this end......:very_drunk:

(By the way, this was flown around the coastline of Britain by Col. the Master of Sempill. They don't make 'em like that any more either.....:mixed-smiley-010: )
 
Thank you, kind sir. But you'll have to allow me until tomorrow to find the next brain teaser because I have nothing on the stocks at present.

As to William Forbes-Sempill, the Master of Sempill, probably it's a jolly good thing, if you have reference to his doings, that they didn't make any more like him - unless, of course, you're Japanese!
 
I thought I might fox you lot for a while by putting up an image of the Gipsy engined prototype - but I should have known better! Yes, it is the Albatros L-82. Over to Scotland with a large glass of eau de vie de prune mirabelle (for which, strangely, there doesn't seem to be an emoticon).
 
Thanks Mike. Just happened to be sitting with the appropriate book open when you posted that, and, well, that tail unit is a bit of a giveaway. Here's the photo from the book which makes it look quite a different machine !
 

Attachments

  • alby.jpg
    alby.jpg
    58 KB · Views: 12
Back
Top