• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

The Ongoing Mystery Aircraft Thread Part Deux.

Yes, I like the Fairchild slider too. I have a nice pic of her sister on floats.

133333ffg.jpg
 
Thanks guys. Only problem with modeling it on floats is that I don't know what kind of floats they used on the 82. It is definitely not the same as the Fairchild P6 floats used by the FC2, FC2W2 and Fairchild 71.

Rats, searched for Bruyere before I posted; but missed it. This thread is getting too long. :mixedsmi:

:icon29: for Moses. Over to you....

-James

P.S. Thanks Lefty for the great Fairchild 82 pictures; stashing them in my photo folder for future reference.
 
Thanks. Oh, and after studying pictures of Fairchild 82s for months; your floaty picture is the first one I've seen that clearly shows that there is cylinderical section right in front of the cockpit. After looking at it, I've gone back and looked at my other pictures, and can see it now; but the lighting on that one makes it stand out clearly. Goes to show, you can't have too many pictures when researching something like this. :wiggle:

-Thanks again.
James
 
And here is a wheelie version

445566fff.jpg



There is a lot of detail in Janes re dimensions, weights, performance, etc etc if you are interested, James.
 
And here is a wheelie version

445566fff.jpg



There is a lot of detail in Janes re dimensions, weights, performance, etc etc if you are interested, James.

Thanks. Sure, if you don't mind; that would be great; I've got a set of specs; but they are not detailed. A second source is also always nice to have.

Been digging around the web; the Noorduyn Norseman Mk. 1 & 2 also used the Edo Type YD-6470 floats. If I can find a three view of one; that would take care of the floats. And having the floats scaled properely will help make sure the rest of the plane is proportioned correctly; since I am just working off of photographs.

-James
 
Well what do you know about that. A big frosty brew for the master!:icon29:

Going to have to go deep into the stinker archive next time.
 
OK, I'm sure that's a limp white flag fluttering over the Alamo, so we'll continue.
It's a Petlyakov VI-100, precursor of the Pe-2. Pressurised cockpits and other features too advanced for its time (1939).

Here's something different. (yes, it's a bipe, but it's a military one)

1221ssz.jpg
 
I thought i had it.. then the second pic confirmed it
Cox-Klemin XA-1
Purpose-built as an Air Ambulance ( one source said one of two built)
 
Not one of Moses' dreaded bipes, and not a floater either although floats eventually became an option...

23lnz7n.jpg


I know.. it's a light a/c but it did operate in commercial ( non-flying-school) service
 
It's a Taylorcraft/Piper clone ! That narrows it down to around 450......... All absolutely b****y identical.......

(Kevin, remind me of the penalty for posting one of those - it's free beers for a week for the rest of us in a pub of our choice, n'est-ce pas ?)
 
Back
Top