stearmandriver
Members +
Doing an online FIRC, got to the module on ATDs and the discussion about making sure you understand just what a specific device is approved for. This was the image they chose to illustrate their point....
-
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
-
Special Server Maintenance
Just when you think you have everything running some what better...
You get a message from the Hosting company. Short story they need to move us to a new server. I have been working with them to plan a good date for all concerned. Here is what we have come up with as a schedule.
- November 4th 17:00 -5UTC shut off the forums and start backup proceedures. During this time there will be no access to the forums or the Resource Section.
- November 5th Continue with Backups and download same until complete.
- November 6th 7:00 turn over server to hosting company to move system to new server
- November 7th - 8th restore backups and upgrade forum software.
If all goes well we should be back online on November 8th.
To keep you updated we will post updates on AVSIM forums.
Thank you for your support.
This made me chuckle...
- Thread starter stearmandriver
- Start date
Looks like 5/5.1CD to me. 4 was vector graphics.
An approved training device can run any software, provided it is appropriately licensed and is approved as part of the package by the regulatory authority. This is what annoys me about the constant statements that XP is "FAA Approved" - it isn't. It >can< be approved as part of an ATD package, but isn't automatically approved.
Considering that MS didn't do a separate ESP-esque version of FS back then, I'm slightly surprised that it isn't Elite or something similar (which, when used with its own hardware, was automatically approved) but there's no reason that FS5 shouldn't be. Heck, I learned to fly instruments on FS5 and it helped me a lot when I got into a real aircraft... Actual pilotage, not at all, but knowing what the instruments did was useful!
Cheers,
Ian P.
An approved training device can run any software, provided it is appropriately licensed and is approved as part of the package by the regulatory authority. This is what annoys me about the constant statements that XP is "FAA Approved" - it isn't. It >can< be approved as part of an ATD package, but isn't automatically approved.
Considering that MS didn't do a separate ESP-esque version of FS back then, I'm slightly surprised that it isn't Elite or something similar (which, when used with its own hardware, was automatically approved) but there's no reason that FS5 shouldn't be. Heck, I learned to fly instruments on FS5 and it helped me a lot when I got into a real aircraft... Actual pilotage, not at all, but knowing what the instruments did was useful!
Cheers,
Ian P.
If they had shown a gorgeous screen shot of an A2A C-172, they couldn't have made their point by showing it. The onlookers could hardly tell it from a real photo.
Nice memories, my first flight sim was by Sublogic on an IBM XT, in 1982. The XT even had two floppy drives, and Hercules graphics on a green screen monitor
Cheers,
Mark
Nice memories, my first flight sim was by Sublogic on an IBM XT, in 1982. The XT even had two floppy drives, and Hercules graphics on a green screen monitor
Cheers,
Mark
srgalahad
Charter Member 2022
So I had to go and pull my box of FS5.0 out of the cupboard to be sure... but no, 5.0 used textures so there was actually a panel image. The image above is highly similar to the one https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/0f/Microsoft_Flight_Simulator_4_screenshot.png
in this article showing FS4.0 (1989)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Microsoft_Flight_Simulator
.
Gordon, I think I still have a Herc card in a box in the corner of the basement if you need a replacement
