• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

Those interested in the A-12-Sr-71 might like to look at this article, very interesti

The Alphasim Virtavia SR-71 works great in FSX but we definitely need the others as well.One of the truly underutilized features of fsx is its high altitude capability. By the way I think the gentleman who modeled the SR for Alpha Virtavia is a member here, I hope because I want to thank him here now for doing such a good job:applause:. While I am passing around praise(this is odd for me usually more of a lurker too shy I guess) thank you Warchild and all the developers involved with P-61 for your wonderfull contributions as well.:applause:
 
I'd like to echo Rkinkors and Dharris's comments as well.. thanking the indugences of the mods-D,did you do any time on the Mercator at VQ-1, or just the Malfunction Junction?
...a knock on the door in the middle of the night...hehe...you and I and Pam could all end up sharing a ride in the same black helicopter some night- and we haven't even got 'round to the REALLY exotic stuff yet- Black Triangles and anti-gravity and the realy weird stuff that went on in the video feeds from the first Hubble repair mission- the first; and only time NASA ever switched all the cameras to live, continuous feed. Pams comments in the her last post show, I feel, why so many of us are such rabid,life long aviation enthusiasts, Flightsim nutters, Modelers, or work in the industry despite the frustrations, long hours, dismal working conditions, lousy renumeration ect... its more than love...its almost religious. Walking into the hangar is like walking into a cathederal...the closest I've been to a religious experience.
And to legitimize the thread-viz a viz flight simulation...
A-11. Kazunori Ito
M-12/D-21(we forgot that one) Kazunori Ito
YF-12A. Kazunori Ito...FS2002/2004, 2D panels only. They should run in FSX.
It was probably seeing those 3 models that drew me into flight simulation.
SR-71. GMAX acadamy. That was the one that spoiled 2D panels for me. What a sweet VC, and something indefinable about that model that, for myself, captures the stance/feel of the mighty Habu.
Alphsim SR-71/Sr-71C- the humpback trainer version; too! Ditto on the flight model! To the Alpha sim allumnus slumming here ( SOH is not a slum, I just cant resist alliterations!) if Kaz Itos penchant for the odder by-ways of aviation drew me into flight simming, Alpha's work made me stay!:applause:
AURORA. nothing really good yet. The Electrosphere/ Ace combat one for FS- makes a good AI object- see page 2 of this thread. There is a pretty slick model for -shhh!-X-plane
BLACK TRIANGLE/Roswell UFO. a FS2002/4 model, based on the zillion sighting and photos of the Triangular, Black, big light in the middle/single small light at each tip UFO( its a black program)-cannot remember who did it- 2d panel with lots of fun features- looked great drifting along slowly, flashing and smoking,the sounds of Glen Miller drifting quietly from inside
http://www.blackbirds.net/sr71/index.html a very interesting site, with some great 'war stories' and insights into the re-activation program.

now to the weird stuff- an Anti Gravity hack-This line of inquiry was started by Dr. T.Townsend Brown. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Townsend_Brown
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2djygtFe6I
Care to guess who Dr Brown ended up working for... Lockheed.
a lot of vitirolic debate, but, the practical application of the technology may be seen regularly... The B-2. More later, if the Moderator will indulge us...
Edit. Hey! footage of Dr.Brown before he went deepblack!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xd0GdaP920
Ta!
Laz.
 
Hi lazarus, nope, by time I got there in '64 we were flying the WV-2's and EA-3B's. Looked into the history of the Q and found the older aircraft and it was amazing that they survived the flights! I thought the WV-s were old, but durable. I flew many hours in them in AEWBARRONPAC the two previous years, loved them. Fourteen hour flights from Midway Island up over the Azores and back. Food was excellent. Too bad about the N.Koreans blasting down DeepSea 129....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EC-121_shootdown_incident some heads should have rolled. If the comm folks that were supposed to be monitoring the intercepts would have been at there posts instead of moving around away from their rooms it might have been different. Here is an interesting article on the NSA.....http://www.american-buddha.com/lit.bodyofsecrets.5.htm
 
Theres a little known physicist on youtube who goes by the nickname of AlienScientist. For anyone who wants to delve into the heart of anti-gravity, I recommend spending a few hours viewing his videos. I guarantee that you will find what he has to say quite fascinating.. Some of his videos are older, and he states that but even then, each video links into the last in a clear and easily understood way. Here's a good place to start..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rr_s28wIOzQ

So, off to morning coffee, and a smoke to start the day :) .. enjoy those videos.. The man definitely knows what he's talking about..

Pam
 
Wee haa.. Thank you Ferry :) :) .. I dont suppose there would be any chance of Vertavia doing a KingFish would there???
Pam
 
As for Aurora. maybe it exists, and maybe it doesnt. What we DO know is that we have an awful lot of people telling us to not pay attention to the little man behind the curtain. Personally, i feel that Aurora is past tense. It existed as a stepping stone towards some thing that we havent done yet but will in the not too distant future.

Its not what someone says that counts, words are cheap and easy to roll off with unending eloquence. And pictures taken from a Kodak Brownie arent exactly the greatest either, but when NOAA's Geostationary satellite takes pictures, i tend to give them more credit, and so the question mark remains for me.. what was that 5000 mile long contrail??

No matter what though, yes, Aurora is finished. It was officially a project during the development of the B-2, and unofficially, a moniker applied by civilian spectators to a phenomena they had observed and speculated about, much as we have done here..

But two questions remain unanswerable..
Why are Fish and Kingfish still top secret ( after 50 years ) and what made that contrail???
 
Morning all- I keep waiting for the mods to pull the trigger on this thread- but I suppose we are amusing.
First off, Dharris- I'd like to say thank you for your service, and all of our cold warriors here, and thank you to all of our uniformed members, past and present. I used to sleep a bit more soundly as a kid , knowing you guys were out there sitting on that GOLF,latter YANKEE that used to sit south of Hawaii aimed at the north west. It took stones like bocchi balls to go dragging your coat-tails under the noses of a lot of trigger-happy folks to keep tabs on what they were doing.Those of us who stood to back then found the 'Cold War' was often uncomfortably hot... for more information on the flying end http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/index.shtml
The Air Combat Information Group is doing a fine job of uncovering and saving the history of that age
Alien scientist rocks! He's a nack for conveying abstractions and ideas- nearly all university proffs could learn from this guy, if they didn't know every thing allready...
This the concepts and mechanisims sound like; and I hate to say it; because the guy is a bit sketchy- Bob Lazars descriptions of work being done at Groom Lake...
Like Bruce Dickensen- he comes of as a...well...moonbat...but there is truth there...
In truth,Townsend Browns work isn't really 'anti-gravity'- it just looks that way. Its a way to generate lift with out fixed or rotating airfoils. The mechinisim is sometimes called Biefeld-Brown effect, or 'capacitance effect'. The short form is, Dr Brown found that in a charged capacitor, the negative end will try to migrate to the positive end, generating force. The more juice one hammers into the capacitor, the more 'push' it generates. The axis of the capacitor from neagative to positive is the force vector. How does this relate to the B-2, and perhaps the OXCART successors?
as early as 1980, odd datums began to trickle out about a project going on at plant42-Palmdale- the ATB. one report noted a 'Dielectric' airframe, others mentioned 'charged leading edges'. As noted earlier, when the B-2 came into sevice, and details became avaliable, questions started being asked concerning, supposed range/payload/performance shortfalls-the air craft should not be able to go as far, carry as much, and fly as fast as was claimed based on published (grain of salt...) engine thrust, SFC, and drag figures. Hmmm. And yet, there it was... the best description of what may be going on, was from Bill Gunstone(AirInternational, Jan 2000)-and lets just say that Mr. Gunstone has been a very credible aerospace and defence analyst with a record of being right where every one else got it wrong, back to the 1950's -to paraphrase:

'I have numerous documents, all published openly in U.S., which purport to explain how the B-2 is even stranger.. far, far.. stranger.. than it appears. Most are articles published in commercial magazines, some are openly published US Patents, while a few are open USAF publications by Wright Aeronautical Laboratory and Air Force Systems Command's Astronautics Laboratory. They deal with such topics as electric field propulsion, and electrogravitics (or anti-gravity), the transient alteration of not only thrust but also a body's weigt.
Sci-Fi has nothing on this stuff.

The literature goes back to Faraday, but the idea of electrogravitics really took off in 1920s when an American physicist, Townsend T Brown, carried out extensive experiments. He may have been the first to recognise that a capacitor (a dielectric material sandwiched between positive and negative plates)
experiences a force tending to move it in the direction of the positive face. He found that the electrostatic charge induced a gravity field between the two plates. Soon he was making capacitors rotate on whirling arms,
and measuring the loss in weight of the capacitor with positive face turned uppermost.

In 1953, Brown demonstrated to the USAF a whirling rig of 50ft (15.2m) diameter, which at 150,000 volts (150kv) became a mere blur. The subject was immediately classified, and for the next 40 years, while 'black' research in this field made astonishing progress, it was not reported. Though private individuals continued to experiment, and to take out unclassified patents, not much surfaced. Exceptions were Electrogravitics Systems (Feb. 1956) and The Gravitics Situation (Dec. 1956), published for subscribers only by Aviation Studies (International). This was London-based 'think tank' run by two very bright young men, R G 'Dick' Worcester and John Longhurst. Unlike the established journals, they published reports and informed comment without the slightest regard for questions of 'security'.
The only time they were taken to court, they won their case and collected heavy damages.

I was fascinated to read those reports, but had no wish to reside in The Tower , so I refained from discussing clever aeroplanes with leading edges charged to millions of volts positive and the trailing edges at millions of volts negative. In any case, it all seemed a bit far-fetched, especially as it appeared that the gravity field could not
only propel aircraft to supersonic speed with propulsive efficiency greater than 1 but could also lift them independently to the atmosphere.

Various snippets appeared suggesting that electrostatic fields could not only do wonderous things in the field of propulsion, but could also reduce aerodynamic turbulence (at any mach number), reduce radar cross-section and even virtually eliminate sonic boom. Indeed, back in 1952, Dr M. Rose had noted in unclassified literature: "The positive field.. travelling in front.. acts as a buffer which starts moving the air out of the way. This.. field acts as an entering wedge which softens the supersonic barrier.." From 1985, the name P A LaViolette emerges as author of a shoal of interesting electrogravitics articles in professional literature.

The first Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit stealth bomber was rolled out on Nov. 22, 1988, and anyone with the slightest interest in the aircraft could not fail to have noticed the unbelievable leading edge, with deep profile coming to a knife-edge almost in line with the upper surface. In 1990, a NASA 'boffin' retired and perhaps foolishly talked to The Arkansas Democrat who did not understand his story and ran it under the headline "Ex-NASA expert says Stealth uses parts from UFO".

What really put the cat among the proverbial pigeons was a feature published in a March 1992 issue of Aviation Week & Space Technology, entitled "Black world engineers, scientists,encourage using highly classified technology for civil applications". For the first time in open literature, this article explained how the B-2s sharp leading edge is charged to "many millions of volts", while the corresponding negative charge is blown out in the jets from the four engines. There is more: though the General Electric F118 engines can operate as ordinary turbofans,
in flight they act as flame-jet generators (Note-MagnetoHetrodynamic electrical generation-an energetic-read hot-conductive fluid-jet exhaust seeded with a salt works fine- moving through a coil, produces a whacking amount of juice), pumping out gas greatly diluted by fresh air, all at millions of volts negative. The word 'flame' gives a rather false picture, because in fact the jet comes out not very much hotter than the surrounding atmosphere.

Unclassified articles have described in some detail how the leading edge is divided into eight sections, each individually ionised. The section on each wing immediately upstream of the engines cannot be thus ionised,
because the air would then enter the engines and cancel out the negative charge in the jets. accordingly, this is where the Hughes covert strike radars are installed. They would not be able to 'see' forwards if they were
anywhere else.

Take-off trust of the F118-100 at sea level is given as '19,000lb (84.5kN) class' by Northrop Grumman and as '17,300lb (77.0kN)' by the USAF. These are startlingly low figures for and aircraft whose take-off weight is said
to be 336,000lb (152,635kg) and which was until recently said to weight 376,000lb (170,550kg). Aircraft usually get heavier over the years, not 20 tonnes lighter. Even at the supposed reduced weight, the ratio of thrust to weight
is a mere of 0.2, an extraordinarily low value for a combat aircraft.

The USAF has never said anything about B-2s speed. It has been tacitly assumed to be in the Mach 0.8 class, but according to extensive open literature, the four F118 engines equate to about 25 MW (megawatts) of electrical power at the take-off, but under the influence of the electrogravitic field the speed could soon become supersonic, the output of the air-diluted exhaust then rising to t least 100 MW.

Everyone who has heard a B-2 take off has been astonished at the quietness. Obviously the noise would not be in the same class as the F101 engines of the B-1B in full afterburner, but writers have used the words 'shocking',
'uncanny' and 'incredible' in describing B-2 departures. Another point to note is thet the channels downstream of the jetpipes appear to be carbon-fibre composite, which is incompatible with normal jet temperatures
(not because of the fibre, but because of the adhesive sticking them together).

Other writers have commented on the size of the B-2 wing and noted that its stealth depends on the huge black skin being made of RAM (radar-absorbent material). This, say the physicists, is 'a high-k, high-density dielectric ceramic, capable of generating an enormous electrogravitic lift force when charged'.

Hmmm. If any one lives near Whitman, has a Campbell Scientific Ltd. CS110 field meter, and wants to test this hypothesis...As a very bright guy who dabbled in physics at Princeton once noted...'The universe is not only stranger than we imagine; its stranger than we can imagine' ...though as Han Solo noted..' I dunno...I can imagine quite a bit!'
Now, I'm with you, Pam. Coffee and a smoke!
 
Thanks for the HU Ferry, I may have to look into that...
Why is FISH/KINGFISH still classified- and what made the contrail- Because the technology 'cloud' that came from all that work was put to use, and though 'exotic'
it was really a suprisingly simple (compared to traditional hypersonic solutions) technology to translate into hard ware- IE the composit aircraft system posited earlier... and likely still flying out of Groom Lake...
A couple of interesting datums... Groom Lake is 'owned' by the Department of Energy.
When Bill Clinton wanted to know what was going on out there,he got told to go to hell and mind your own business! And, it stuck! How in the heck did the DOE end up with that kind of heat behind it...When you can tell the President to sod off, and make it stick...hmmm
Space Command...Why have a Space Command, unless you need to operate in space. The recconiasance satilite assets are owned and operated by the NRO, launched by Airforce missleers , BMEWS and SPACETRACK- tracking earth orbiting objects, operated by NORAD- so why even have such an organization?- the missons officialy conducted by Space Command are already done by other agencies-So what is it exactly that they are doing...some day, I'm sure, the story will come out- but I expect long after I'm wormfood!
 
pffft. wormfood indeed..
I can only speculate that groom lake is owned by the DOE because it is a nuclear test site and was before the DOD needed to build a test center there.. As for the space plane, its a matter of follow the money trail.. or in this case, the interest trail.. Like following a contrail to the plane it comes from simply by observing where it doesnt exist, we can elliminate all of the parties you mentioned above, which leaves us with very few parties to choose as interested parties. Specifically, i'm implying the military-industrial complex and the DOD.. The job of the DOD is to prepare for doomsday, and their budget reflects that, being the highest budget granted in the country.. With a continued philosophy of mutually assured destruction ( MAD ) They can be incredibly scary..
Anyway, lots of distraction so i can never get a clear thought out today. Perhaps tonight i'll be more clear and able to respond appropriately..

And yes.. Thank you to the Admins for trusting me on this. Its greatly appreciated..
Pam
 
hmm, liftingbodies? Ram jets?? ( scram jets? ).. I cant say much about the power plants, but the parasitic delta lifting body design resurfaced just a few years after fish was cancelled in an orbiter precursor called dynasoar. I havent done much study in relationship to that project, but i do know that it led to the orbiter, which itself could be viewed as a parasite seeing it requires a complete set of rockets to get it into space, and then glides back down ( like a brick or so i hear ) Kingfish, by the numbers, was inferior to the sr-71 in all except one way. it was practically invisible.
I would ask a question. If your invisible, whats the rush?? You dont need all that speed, if you cant be seen, and lower speeds equates to less fuel being used.Less fuel means more money is available for other projects.. But the F-117 is such a break in design from the Kingfish.. yes, it has components, even some that Kelly Johnson originallyscoffed at. but And the B-2, though it also uses many of the same design features as the Kingfish ( internal engines, angled edges etc ) Is also a complete break from the Kingfish. In fact, the only place i can see anything coming close to an application straight from the fish/kingfish stable, is in the space plane/intercepter. we've got the X-37B, japan has a design on the boards that looks like a science fiction version of kingfish, and china has a parasite design on the boards that resembles the original fish configuration.. Of course, these are all just appearances and i have no proof that they are real.. Still, here we are with two secret planes, that have been kept secret all these years, and a whole lotta things related or not, that raise several unanswered questions..


Japan View attachment 41220



View attachment 41221china
 
Speaking of flitsim models, ahemmm to keep this in models, I was looking at simviation in the concepts section and there is a treasure trove of models from William Ortis of Lionheart Creations lots and lots of really new and different sims.
FS2004 F-136B Orbital Defense Interceptor concept jet fighter even has a pulse ramjet thingy. Now we are back on topic, so you guys with all the far out and really interesting information can continue with what we had. This is great stuff.
 
If your invisible, whats the rush?? You dont need all that speed, if you cant be seen, and lower speeds equates to less fuel being used.Less fuel means more money is available for other projects..

Timely intelligence information. Back in the 1960's air to ground transfer of real-time data was a thing of science fiction, in fact it wasn't until the mid 19902 when the SR was brought back that the SR-71 sported a working datalink.

Although datalinks had been used on the TR-1 for some time the SR-71 was starved of development funding even though the technology was around in the mid-late 80's.
 
Oh yah- Bills F-136! I keep intending to haul that out and finish the cockpit off. Aero-Diamond lens vehicles- another candidate for the doughnought on a rope machine!
Why have a highly supersonic/hypersonic, long range capability- you hit it right on the head-
Timely intell, thats key, worth any cost. The ability to penetrate heavily contested air space- to this day, anything going M-3+ at FL100+ is UNINTERCEPTABLE. Paitriot, GRUMBLE,GLADIATOR-sorry Almaz, Raytheon, no soap. You cannot shoot it down. Even ABM system are SOL, unless you can blind side 'em- but they've( the hypersonic) got to come in dumb. As long as the RHAWS is working, you can out maneouver 'em- the angular rate changes too quickly for the missile to keep a high altitude hypersonic inside its engagement envelope. And to forstall the 'but you can shoot down a re-entry vehicle (ballistic missile)' rejoinder- yup, but its comming more or less straight at you, very low angular rate, and its hard. Better to get a Ballistic missile when its boosting, going nice and slow- point ABM defence- use a nuke and make sure. They should have kept LGM99 Sprint.
An obvious mission for a hypersonic-especally in the age of unstable despots with theater nuclear forces and the risk of a regional conflict escalating rapidly-Pakistan rolled up their nuclear TBM's in the last 2 border disputes with India and some of the local commanders were very close to(no encoded permissive action locks on the weapons!) 'turning the key', for instance- is warfare prevention-really!-its capabilities noted above, the ability to loiter, and a kinetic kill( no warhead ) weapon could give you the ability to -with good intell-reach any point on the globe in no more than 90 minute, much less if your loitering near by, and take away their toys-stomp on missile sites, air defence, C4I, mechanized forces, airfields- you can go at it with sticks and clubs if you want to, boys, but you can't start world war 3. I'd recommend Larry Niven and Jerry Pournell's novel "Footfall' for a description of exactly the weapon system-smart chaps and great writers, those guys. The concept is called 'Rods of God' or 'Flying Crowbars'. The NATO air campaign in the Balkans was a pretty convincing demonstration of this strategy, when procecuted vigourously.
Hmmm. you know, maybe this thread,ifwe wish to procecute it vigorously,should be moved over to Historical wings... this kind of stuff is a hobby horse I like to beat, and I have a tough time shutting the heck up- so I get to feeling guilty about eating up space in the Sim thread...
 
Paaleeesssee don't shut up! You are doing just fine. If for whatever reason this has to be moved, send me $5 and a cup of joe and I am fine with it, whatever the group wishes. This is already more than I had hoped for. Great info, everone. Thanks.
 
Back
Top