to sli or not to sli,,,that is the question

pyhsics card just smooths things out like explosions or movement so it looks more natural.......just eye candy stuff really.

as for sli, I had it in my old rig(nothing wrong with it), but I still think sli is on its way out, at least unnecessary today. Get a big time single card like 200 series nvidia and you won't have to deal with so many fans running and waking up your neighbors, but I would asy get a mobo capable of sli, as I am no expert and could be very wrong about sli going out.......but I don't know if you could fit many more of these monsters in a case.:Banane40:
 
sli

thanks cliff, that was helpfull

have always known that sli was not going to help with off3, I just am making sure my next computer will play the next generation of games

cameljocky, did some quick poking around, and can not find a 260 with dual gpu. I do see a 295 card with them, Am i missing something?
 
Get 1 Nvidia GTX 280 with at least 1 GB memory and forget SLI. The GTX 280 is a monster and crushes the frame rates in OFF. (a fast CPU and a large gob of system memory can't hurt either).
 
I love these threads about SLI. It has to be the most misunderstood implementation of hardware since the atomic bomb. Here's my $.02:

- SLI doesn't help much in OFF (but doesn't seem to help much, IMHO).
- SLI *DEFINITELY* does work, and it's not at all a pain - unless you consider clicking the button that says "Enable SLI" a pain. That's all I've ever really had to do, and it makes a substantial difference (except in OFF).
- The "physics" thing: This has been available for some time now. The drivers, when enabled for SLI, let you pick whether to enable or disable physics. As I understand it, enabling physics means one of the two GPUs is tasked with doing the physics work (not both).
- Some chipsets do not support running *both* PCIe slots at 16x. My opinion is you shouldn't bother with a board that won't run both at full 16x.

SLI is a mistake if you buy all new hardware, at the same time, to set it up. By that, I mean that you're better off performance wise to buy 1 high-end card than to buy two lesser cards just to set them up for SLI. (The obvious exception is those well-off enough to buy *two* high end cards, at the same time). It's pretty much long been established that you don't get 200% increase by adding a second card in SLI.

Where SLI pays off, is - assuming you already bought a SLI-capable motherboard and 1 card, then you can add another identical card later (at the point when the second card is still cheaper than the high-end card). Doing so might also forestall having to replace an entire motherboard and all that goes with (assuming your 'upgrade path' was otherwise exhausted, but the CPU still holds it's own).

Our friend Over50 writes above that he may well be the textbook case of where SLI pays off: He can increase the performance of his machine withing having to go 'full-top-end', and without having to change his entire rig out. (Note that YMMV; the performance you see is determined by lots of factors - this is one of the reasons OFF doesn't seem to benefit from SLI).

SLI is NOT the total crap almost everyone seems determined to call it. It is also NOT the end-all answer that everyone *else* seems to want to call it.

(please note the foregoing is entirely my opinion)

Oh, great... Talk about constipation....er... I mean consternation....or maybe both at this point. I think I'll post on the Evga GTX 200 series forum and see what the concensus is over there...
 
Update: Posting on the Evga GTX 200 series forum has so far netted a number of "it should" or "yeah, man do it" and...well, worthless comment, meaning all opinions - not first hand experience or linked test data...

Sigh.....
 
Tell ya what, O50 - if I can (maybe this coming weekend?) I'll try to do just what you asked: Post some measureable test dat. Since we know it doesn't help much with OFF, not much to test.

But, I can (and have) run SLI/non-SLI as a test in 3dMark03 and 05, plus a few games I use; at least Company of Heroes has a frame rate tester, maybe also CoD/W@W too.
 
Tell ya what, O50 - if I can (maybe this coming weekend?) I'll try to do just what you asked: Post some measureable test dat. Since we know it doesn't help much with OFF, not much to test.

But, I can (and have) run SLI/non-SLI as a test in 3dMark03 and 05, plus a few games I use; at least Company of Heroes has a frame rate tester, maybe also CoD/W@W too.

That would be fantastic especially with CoD:WAW! For comparison I was playing the last Russian segment of CoD/WAW earlier tonight (to see if the scrambled, multi-color freeze would show up - which it didn't) at a steady 90 fps based on FRAPS. Your SLI test would be a great comparison. :applause:
 
Back
Top