• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63)

Yorktown Class

Which Yorktown class do you intend to do? Angle-deck Essex carriers or WWII Enterprise/Hornet/Yorktown class carriers?
 
Uss Constellation night textures

Checking the night textures in the ship

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • lights.jpg
    lights.jpg
    26.8 KB · Views: 19
Almost done with the texture for the air wing to use in the USS CONSTELLATION

attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • c1.jpg
    c1.jpg
    19.4 KB · Views: 10
  • c2.jpg
    c2.jpg
    15.1 KB · Views: 10
  • c3.jpg
    c3.jpg
    21.2 KB · Views: 10
  • c4.jpg
    c4.jpg
    28.9 KB · Views: 11
All test done

I finished with the test in PREPARD3D and FSX at this point the changes for FSX are done, the differences are only one elevator can be use to go to hangar deck, in FSX version, yesterday i add a wire trap gauge, only to know the number of the cable trapped in the landing and made some changes in the night textures, now i start with the install instruction for the pack

attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • WIRE2.jpg
    WIRE2.jpg
    52.8 KB · Views: 12
  • n1.jpg
    n1.jpg
    13.1 KB · Views: 1
  • wire.jpg
    wire.jpg
    24.9 KB · Views: 11
  • constenight.jpg
    constenight.jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 11
  • fsx.jpg
    fsx.jpg
    23.9 KB · Views: 12
Looking forward to this, thanks Walter, CV63, 64, & 66 in the pack for FSX and P3D v4, then a Essex class carrier, JFK CV-67, update to CVN-78 after ?, your gonna be busy, again thank you.
 
Looking forward to this, thanks Walter, CV63, 64, & 66 in the pack for FSX and P3D v4, then a Essex class carrier, JFK CV-67, update to CVN-78 after ?, your gonna be busy, again thank you.

the plans at the moment are, ENTERPRISE cv-6, John F. Kennedy cvn-79 and the update of cvn-78, although I'm still not sure if CV-6 or CVN-79 will work first, or projects in parallel maybe
 
Hi - looking good.

Am wondering why in the last round of night shots, the light neither illuminate the static aircraft, nor those in turn cast a shadow under said light.

Again, just curious - otherwise, it's coming along nicely.

dl
 
Hi - looking good.

Am wondering why in the last round of night shots, the light neither illuminate the static aircraft, nor those in turn cast a shadow under said light.

Again, just curious - otherwise, it's coming along nicely.

dl
the pic is from FSX, in another angle the light illuminates the aircraft better, but not with the same quality as in P3D

attachment.php

ut not with the same quality as in P3D
 

Attachments

  • fsxn.jpg
    fsxn.jpg
    24.9 KB · Views: 18
the plans at the moment are, ENTERPRISE cv-6, John F. Kennedy cvn-79 and the update of cvn-78, although I'm still not sure if CV-6 or CVN-79 will work first, or projects in parallel maybe

Do you mean John F. Kennedy CV-67 ??, CVN-78 & 79 and the new Enterprise CVN-80 is basically the same Ford class ships, would think just the hull #'s would be different for those.
 
Released

After several months and a lot of help from the forum members who have collaborated with me through photos and information about the aircraft carriers, they are finished, I really appreciate this help since it allows me to detail the models to the real ones, the package contains an installer for FSX and P3D, the main difference of FSX being the night lighting that is less detailed and that only 1 elevator can be used to descend to the hangar deck(Number 4), in FSX it was presented in a few cases that the platform of the elevator is crossed by the aircraft and falls into the sea, but I preferred to leave the possibility of using the hangar deck to eliminate it completely in the FSX version, since this fault does not occur in all cases, these include the following animations



This package presents the tree models of the class, in different periods of time and AIR WING on deck


-USS KITTY HAWK 1979
attachment.php

-USS AMERICA 1970

attachment.php

-USS CONSTELLATION 2003
attachment.php




ANIMATIONS


ELEVATOR N.1 **
ELEVATOR N.2 **
ELEVATOR N.3 **
ELEVATOR N.4 **
ELEVATOR DOOR N.1 *
ELEVATOR DOOR N.2 *
ELEVATOR DOOR N.3 *
ELEVATOR DOOR N.4 *
LSO OFFICER *
ANTENNAS *
TERRIER MISSILE ***
HANGAR DOOR N.1 AND N.2 *


CASTLE CARRIER NUMBER LIGHTS *
HULL LIGHTS *
DECK LIGHT (WHITE and BLUE) *
PARKING AREA LIGHTS *
RABBIT LIGHTS *
POSITIONING LIGHTS *
REFLECTOR LIGHTS IN THE CASTLE *
AIR WING DECK ***
CREW
RADARS
FLAGS


* Controled by the user.
**For the FSX version only the Elevator N.4 is functional.
*** Only available in the USS AMERICA

The package includes a custom gauge for FSX and P3D simulators and at the last moment i added a AoA and trap cable gauge.

The models have been publised in simmarket



 

Attachments

  • kitty.jpg
    kitty.jpg
    71.9 KB · Views: 14
  • constelation.jpg
    constelation.jpg
    87.2 KB · Views: 12
  • america.jpg
    america.jpg
    79.4 KB · Views: 10
Fiinal Comments

All positive. Absolutely fantastic job. Thank you for all your efforts and honored to cooperate in completion in this quality. :loyal:
 
Agree! Walter, this is truly fantastic - and my sim is FSX. I can only imagine what P3DV4 looks like.
One question - perhaps it is me, but there does not seem to be any difference between the "Landing" deck layout and the "Takeoff C" deck layout - on America. Haven't yet tried Connie or Kitty Hawk.

Great work, and many thanks.
Deke
 
Agree! Walter, this is truly fantastic - and my sim is FSX. I can only imagine what P3DV4 looks like.
One question - perhaps it is me, but there does not seem to be any difference between the "Landing" deck layout and the "Takeoff C" deck layout - on America. Haven't yet tried Connie or Kitty Hawk.

Great work, and many thanks.
Deke

hi thanks for the support, this is the config in deck

attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • a.jpg
    a.jpg
    58.4 KB · Views: 10
  • c.jpg
    c.jpg
    60 KB · Views: 10
  • e.jpg
    e.jpg
    66.7 KB · Views: 10
Right, still very positive on this - very nicely done. Even from your screenshots, the "Landing" config and the "Takeoff C" config appear to be the same configuration. If that was intended, that's fine, just drawing it to your attention if it was not.

Also, i noted the absence of A-6's from VA-165 - were they supposed to be included?

Again, Walter - this is truly a superb effort and thanks again.

Cheers, Deke
 
Right, still very positive on this - very nicely done. Even from your screenshots, the "Landing" config and the "Takeoff C" config appear to be the same configuration. If that was intended, that's fine, just drawing it to your attention if it was not.

Also, i noted the absence of A-6's from VA-165 - were they supposed to be included?

Again, Walter - this is truly a superb effort and thanks again.

Cheers, Deke



hi, i remove the INTRUDER at the last minute and add more fighters, in the next project that has squads with intruder I will include it
 
Back
Top