Cameljockey
Flame On!
It's right next to the 9800GX2.
CJ
CJ
Hum!!! do I read this right: you never had OFF running on your computer because you did not have CFS3 or running it on an cracked CFS3.
You obviously missed the post OvS made a while back. The one about how his cat chewed on his original CFS3 CD and how he now uses it as a coaster? The CD....not the cat.
Well I'm not sure where you got it, but most of that info is either inaccurate or dead wrong.
Any of the dual core or quad core cpu's (particularly the i7 because of it's superior memory controller and DDR3 support) will run circles around your single core processor when clocked to the same or even similar speeds. This is mostly due to improved overall chip architecture and the fact that an additional core or 3 are able to take on some (or all in some cases) of the other tasks related to basic system operations, leaving a single core to run your app of choice (OFF for instance). Core affinity tweaking may come into play here, but the potential for optimization of multiple core based systems is indeed a reality at this point.
Not so many programs at this point are set up for mulitple core applications. Perhaps when you upgrade in 2 years, that will be the case.
Doubtful. The 8800GT and the 8800GTS were available with 512 MB of onboard memory. The 8800GTX came with 768 MB as far as I know.
Yes, you are correct
That's accurate in that a fast enough CPU will allow your GPU to realize it's full potential without the CPU being the bottleneck. Best to have a balanced setup though. No sense running a GTX280 with a single core Pentium or Athlon clocked at whatever 'cause your cpu will choke the living snot out of your graphics card. Same as if you were to pair an i7 965 up with an Nvidia 5700. The system will only process information (or generate graphics) as fast as the slowest piece of hardware will allow for, and I don't care if Microsoft's flightsims are more cpu bound. You need a balanced approach to realize your hardware's full potential....period.
Oh, and a single core @ 3.8. How much $ to get a dual core to run that fast?
Not sure who told you that, but basically it's utter nonsense. Additional RAM on a video card can be a huge advantage in a number of different situations. Comes in real handy, particularly if you're running a large monitor at extremely high resolutions.
The fellow that puts my system together runs two 30" monitors, High Res,as he is a professional photographer too,with a Nvid GeForce7900GTX. There is no memory issue. More than a 30 " monitor, perhaps you want more than 512, but who runs that? So more is a waste if you're running less.
Cheers,
Parky
Not so many programs at this point are set up for mulitple core applications. Perhaps when you upgrade in 2 years, that will be the case.
Yes, you are correct
Oh, and a single core @ 3.8. How much $ to get a dual core to run that fast?
The fellow that puts my system together runs two 30" monitors, High Res,as he is a professional photographer too,with a Nvid GeForce7900GTX. There is no memory issue. More than a 30 " monitor, perhaps you want more than 512, but who runs that? So more is a waste if you're running less.
Any of the dual core or quad core cpu's (particularly the i7 because of it's superior memory controller and DDR3 support) will run circles around your single core processor when clocked to the same or even similar speeds. This is mostly due to improved overall chip architecture and the fact that an additional core or 3 are able to take on some (or all in some cases) of the other tasks related to basic system operations, leaving a single core to run your app of choice (OFF for instance).
Parky
Hum!!! do I read this right: you never had OFF running on your computer because you did not have CFS3 or running it on an cracked CFS3.
It gets a little confusing there, but you get the point... what business do you have asking a question like that. It's all ligit.
OvS
These guys micro analyze everything. It's not worth doing that for the average Joe like me.
OvS
Couldn't afford the E8600 and GTX280, so I "settled" for an E8500 3.16Ghz and an 8800GTX, but it came well recommended by one of the devs. Should do just fine. I guess I'll know in a few days, if that freakin' mailman would hurry!
CJ