• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

Whatever happened to Mike Stone?

T

tigisfat

Guest
He was once a major player, and produced countless aircraft when few were. Surely, some developers here that've been at it since the early days had to have known him. I've only heard rumors that he got fed up with everyone and quit the hobby. Until they are substantiated, I'll just consider them rumors.

What's he up to now? Where'd he go, and why did he quit making freeware? Surely someone that knows as much as he did could've turned into a great modern payware developer.
 
well, that's not what i heard. i heard he was a c.i.a. operative who embedded code into his models that allowed the agency to study people's flight sim usage for possible adaptation to real life scenarios. when he finished compiling the data, he was assigned to another "black" project. it's all very hush-hush. sources who listen in on the feed from langley hint at a similar operation involving a mind reading technique and certain off-world technologies that were reverse engineered from captured greys that are kept in stasis under holston mountain in tennessee.
 
cheezyflier said:
well, that's not what i heard. i heard he was a c.i.a. operative who embedded code into his models that allowed the agency to study people's flight sim usage for possible adaptation to real life scenarios. when he finished compiling the data, he was assigned to another "black" project. it's all very hush-hush. sources who listen in on the feed from langley hint at a similar operation involving a mind reading technique and certain off-world technologies that were reverse engineered from captured greys that are kept in stasis under holston mountain in tennessee.
Click to expand...

Cheezy, I'm rolling on the floor after reading that, actually have tears in my eyes !!! Wait.... I live close to Holston Mountain...hope I don't disappear :toilet:

Darrell
 
cheezyflier said:
well, that's not what i heard. i heard he was a c.i.a. operative who embedded code into his models that allowed the agency to study people's flight sim usage for possible adaptation to real life scenarios. when he finished compiling the data, he was assigned to another "black" project. it's all very hush-hush. sources who listen in on the feed from langley hint at a similar operation involving a mind reading technique and certain off-world technologies that were reverse engineered from captured greys that are kept in stasis under holston mountain in tennessee.
Click to expand...


Damn that's funny!
 
cheezyflier said:
well, that's not what i heard. i heard he was a c.i.a. operative who embedded code into his models that allowed the agency to study people's flight sim usage for possible adaptation to real life scenarios. when he finished compiling the data, he was assigned to another "black" project. it's all very hush-hush. sources who listen in on the feed from langley hint at a similar operation involving a mind reading technique and certain off-world technologies that were reverse engineered from captured greys that are kept in stasis under holston mountain in tennessee.
Click to expand...

That would explain why Buzz Aldrin was on "Dancing With The Stars"... Hmmmm. :kilroy:
 
So I guess this is you then Cheezy:

tinfoil-hat1.jpg


:d
 
Lmao I wanted to inquire about Mike as well until I read cheezy post and that was hella funny lol. On a serious note, our hobby really misses Mike Stone and his work. I know I for sure do.
 
The morale of the story here guys is "don't look a gift horse in the mouth", whilst many developers don't always give you exactly what you want, they do try to give something.
 
The morale of the story here guys is "don't look a gift horse in the mouth", whilst many developers don't always give you exactly what you want, they do try to give something.​
Click to expand...

Excellent post. :salute:
 
michael davies said:
The morale of the story here guys is "don't look a gift horse in the mouth", whilst many developers don't always give you exactly what you want, they do try to give something.
Click to expand...

Yes indeed, Michael.
And they are doing it for their own pleasure and enjoyment, not someone else's.
Some folks don't understand the concept of being quietly thankful for what they have been graciously given.
A simple "Thank you!" is often all that is truly needed, and wanted.
 
Dain Arns said:
Yes indeed, Michael.
And they are doing it for their own pleasure and enjoyment, not someone else's.
Some folks don't understand the concept of being quietly thankful for what they have been graciously given.
A simple "Thank you!" is often all that is truly needed, and wanted.
Click to expand...

Mike Stone's work was free, and we should and are be eternally thankful. I don't know who drummed him out, but I never saw it. I hope it wasn't anyone I know.

You said most developers: I won't be "quietly thankful" for a product that I paid money for. I'll either be publically thankful or seeking to warn others.
 
It seems that Mike Stone is now occupying himself building model ships such as the Cutty Sark here.

View attachment 4572

However, many of the comments posted on his site aren't about his ship models but are more along the lines of "Hey where can I download the planes?"
 
tigisfat said:
Mike Stone's work was free, and we should and are be eternally thankful. I don't know who drummed him out, but I never saw it. I hope it wasn't anyone I know.

You said most developers: I won't be "quietly thankful" for a product that I paid money for. I'll either be publically thankful or seeking to warn others.
Click to expand...

Never said "Most developers". Don't misquote me and then condemn me for something I never said or inferred.
 
cajj1 said:
It seems that Mike Stone is now occupying himself building model ships such as the Cutty Sark here.

View attachment 4572

However, many of the comments posted on his site aren't about his ship models but are more along the lines of "Hey where can I download the planes?"
Click to expand...

haha!! That looks beautiful. That dude has a lot of talent.

side note: It's a crying shame that we lost the cutty sark.
 
Dain Arns said:
[...]
And they are doing it for their own pleasure and enjoyment, not someone else's.
[...]
Click to expand...

Maybe I misunderstand this, but I doubt that this matter can be generalized like this. I think, doing something that someone else enjoys is most certainly part of "their own pleasure and enjoyment". Otherwise there would be no real point in releasing something free to the public.
I also think that criticism and being thankful can go along together. If someone is pointing something out politely and with the goal of improvement, as a developer I would be glad to hear this. At last, it could be something important that I have missed myself and feel that this should be corrected. It just all depends on how this is done. I'm glad I see this here at SOH being done that way (mostly), very professional.

my 2 ct.

Cheers,
Mark
 
Dain Arns said:
Never said "Most developers". Don't misquote me and then condemn me for something I never said or inferred.
Click to expand...


Your comment was a piggyback of Michael's comment. He said "most developers", therefore it was positively implied by you. Next time I'll multiquote, sorry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top