B
before
Guest
We're a Flight Sim community, with a few historians sprinkled here and there
Yea, a good place to talk about that, and generally to talk about the WW1 history as a whole cause accuracy of the sim is what makes it interesting, isn't it?
This alone should tell you something about Fonck. Rickenbacker, MvR, Udet, Göring, even Frank Luke had books and movies made about them... not Fonck. No one like an arrogant jerk, it doesn't sell, and no one cares. That's like writing a book about the guy up the street who has the biggest house, and the biggest cars and spends his whole day shoving it in your face about how good he is and how much he has. Why would you want to read about that?
Well, even Guynemer doesn't have so much books written about him here in France. A shame IMHO.
Why the Haegelen quote, most likely he was the only person that was willing, and close enough to Fonck to put his name to his words. Plus it was a name people could recognize. Are they going to quote the mechanic, the new guy, the CO? No. The quote the people who everyone recognizes. Hey, I commend the guy for being honest. If Fonck was such a nice guy, then why not teach more of the French pilots his tactics... nope... keep it to yourself so you can be the best. Hence... self-centered. I don't remember anyone saying that about Boelcke, or Immelmann.. or even Coppens himself.
Haegelen wasn't the only one. Nevermind.
Again... I appreciate your desire to defend Fonck, and your arguments and data are well fit for your opinion, but it will not change what was written about him from many a person that knew of him. Not just Haegelen. When your WHOLE COUNTRY dislikes you... you have a problem.
That's the data one can reasonability find. Maybe it's easier for a French indeed. Well, the fact that the probability for poeple to change their views is low doesn't mean that everybody must speak the same way. Even if telling something different might appear useless, I see no reason not to share additional facts.
I would be happy if poeple barely start to think, 'humm well, he is supposed to have been an arrogant bastard, but apparently that's not so sure anyway'. No matter what they will think from this point; Fonck personality isn't all black or all white.
As for the whole Nazi thing.... again... choose your freinds wisely. If Fonck truly cared for his country .... he would have given more than just 'advice'. He should have been involved in training the new pilots of the French Airforce, helping select equipment... test planes, give combat advice, pressure the government... even get more involved in politics. No, he gives warning in public format.
He was involved in Politics indeed before the war, but was hated and mostly ignored for the warnings he used to do. Here some things of what he did at that time:
1925 to 1927: technical advisor for the USAF. Then as a reserve Capitaine first, and later as a reserve Commandant, he took part in trainings with the 34th Régiment d'Aviation (1927, 1931, 1933, 1934, 1936) but not as an instructor... The French army asked him to do so in order to get the right to fly in the air service. In 1935 he worked with the government in order to improve the training of pursuit pilots (but nothing is said if the government actually followed him)... He eventually got elected as the Deputé des Vosges, and probably got lots of political enemies from this period. It was probably a mistake.
During the war, as I've already said, he became outlaw for Vichy regime and left Vichy for Paris where after having helped mates such as Heurtaux (another friend of him...; cf. the whole citation of his Certificate of Resistance); he was then imprisonned in Drancy camp by the nazis. So... history speaks for his role for his country -> that's why he has been awarded the so-called Certificate in 1948.
:ernae: