I just had Wozza's freeware T-6 Texan up in FSX. Now, I'm not a real pilot, have never sat in a Texan. But 10 days ago I stood inches away from a real life T-6 Texan....for a good 30 minutes. The Texan is my Number 1 favorite aircraft of all time....hands down, no questions asked. I spent a lot of time studying that real Texan and have done the same thing to Wozza's Texans (which I have been flying for a while now...started with his CFS2 version, then his FS9 version...which I still fly the most....and now his FSX version). His FSX version is, to the best of my ability to judge, SPOT ON visually.
Complicated? Yeah...it takes me at least 10 minutes to get the bird started so I can fly it.
Is it payware quality? I would say YES. I only have 3 payware birds in FSX. Lionheart's Dynamic and Skylark packages and the GAS Lockheed L-12. So, the pool of payware that I can compare it to is limited...but I would say that it is on par with the payware that I do have.
If I were a payware developer (I am not, just saying), I would be hesitant to produce a Texan package knowing that a superb freeware package is already out. I can't see what more could be done to make a payware Texan that much better than Wozza's freeware one. A2A could do an Accu-Sim work up on a Texan. Vertigo Studios could do up a Texan with authentic WW2 clothing on the pilot. Maybe a payware package could have some oil dripping from the engine or something...but really, there isn't much room for improvement over Wozza's Tex. Yeah, from my point of view (as a non-developer mind you), I would not spend the hundreds and hundreds of hours needed to develop a payware Texan just to get meager sales because...let's face it...there's a superb freeware Texan readily available.
OBIO