kelticheart
Charter Member
Oh, yeah! SOH teamwork again!
Hi Dave,
thank you very much for coming to the rescue!
I secretly hoped you showed up sooner or later......
I will test fly your *.mdl today. In the meantime, to answer your comment above, the contact points in the FM I posted yesterday are already the ones you sent me back in 11/2014 for the M.C.205.
After Manuele wrote me he had developed the M.C.205 from his previous release of the M.C.202, therefore both aircraft contact points are identical in FS9, I immediately copied the [contact_point] section of the M.C.205 CFS2 aircraft.cfg into this one.
This is why I came forward so strongly yesterday, stating that no amount of aircraft.cfg adjustment will cure the shooting up problem of the wheels.
I hope you agree with me this Folgore model is just as gorgeous as the Veltro we worked on, coming with a mind-spinning array of historical repaints depicting almost all the units which flew the M.C.202 in WWII.
As it was said before for other models, she deserves a place where military planes belong to: CFS2!
Voyager:
Did you try the FM I posted yesterday? Apart from the wheels joke, MVG3d's M.C.202 should have the correct weight, static height and shock absorbing compression rate with this aircraft.cfg and airfile.
With it, I tested her taxiing on regular runways, British BoB grass fields and even on rough ground off runways. I had no blowups on my pc, unless I abused her with high speeds, sudden turns forcing a ground loop or strong braking.
Thank you everybody for your invaluable contribution!

KH
Thanks for doing a test run with the mdl voyager.
I'll take a look at the contact points when @ home. Maybe Stef had a chance to swap out the ones from the M.C. 205.
Like he said, they should match up fairly well.
If it is ok, will look into the other models. Hopefully the issue will be the same in all of them.
That's a lot of work you did on all of the files Mario! Everything else looks mighty fine. IMHO
Dave
Hi Dave,
thank you very much for coming to the rescue!


I will test fly your *.mdl today. In the meantime, to answer your comment above, the contact points in the FM I posted yesterday are already the ones you sent me back in 11/2014 for the M.C.205.
After Manuele wrote me he had developed the M.C.205 from his previous release of the M.C.202, therefore both aircraft contact points are identical in FS9, I immediately copied the [contact_point] section of the M.C.205 CFS2 aircraft.cfg into this one.
This is why I came forward so strongly yesterday, stating that no amount of aircraft.cfg adjustment will cure the shooting up problem of the wheels.
I hope you agree with me this Folgore model is just as gorgeous as the Veltro we worked on, coming with a mind-spinning array of historical repaints depicting almost all the units which flew the M.C.202 in WWII.
As it was said before for other models, she deserves a place where military planes belong to: CFS2!
Voyager:
Did you try the FM I posted yesterday? Apart from the wheels joke, MVG3d's M.C.202 should have the correct weight, static height and shock absorbing compression rate with this aircraft.cfg and airfile.
With it, I tested her taxiing on regular runways, British BoB grass fields and even on rough ground off runways. I had no blowups on my pc, unless I abused her with high speeds, sudden turns forcing a ground loop or strong braking.
Thank you everybody for your invaluable contribution!


KH