• There seems to be an up tick in Political commentary in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site we know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religiours commentary out of the fourms.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politicion will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment amoung members. It is a poison to the community. We apprciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

1U1_Moose Creek

Mario Donadon said:
I understand but on the SBX you have the option to make several heights in the same file, if you wish
Click to expand...
Right, as does ADE. When you draw the flatten poly you can set it to allow adjustments to each node of the poly if necessary. I assume that's what you're referring to?
 
Ed,Another FINE airfield/ airstrip. Thank you so much for your mini Idaho Back county airstrip series. Rob
 
sidler said:
Bushawk XP /Prepar3D v4.5

Screenshot (7) by Richard Couture, on Flickr
Click to expand...
Great pic Sidler. I was just telling someone that I had the Bushawk as well and honestly liked the detailing and how it flew but with Trackir I had a choice of either adjusting the eyepoint so I could see over the cowling and not be able to see out the left window. . .or adjust it down to see out the window and have no fwd vision at all. Finally uninstalled it.
 
sidler said:
Thanks Ed.........the Bushawk flies just fine in Prepar v4.5 & v5.1

sidler
Click to expand...
I agree, it flies great in FSX as well, but I'm used to being able to look to the left and visually see the flaps extension or at least the wing. You can't do that with the Bushawk because the airplane is designed with the pilot sitting higher than the top edge of the window so you have to bend down low enough to see out the window if you want to look back to the left. Basically take a Cub, a Pacer, any high wing airplane and you can easily look left and see the wing. The Bushawk isn't that way and for me it takes a real getting used to to enjoy an otherwise beautiful Bush Plane.
 
falcon409 said:
I agree, it flies great in FSX as well, but I'm used to being able to look to the left and visually see the flaps extension or at least the wing. You can't do that with the Bushawk because the airplane is designed with the pilot sitting higher than the top edge of the window so you have to bend down low enough to see out the window if you want to look back to the left. Basically take a Cub, a Pacer, any high wing airplane and you can easily look left and see the wing. The Bushawk isn't that way and for me it takes a real getting used to to enjoy an otherwise beautiful Bush Plane.
Click to expand...

My CT206H Stationair from Carenado is like you described above. A truly stunning aircraft otherwise.
I have mine set up to see comfortably out the front, and only about 40 or so feet through the left hand side window - the top bar of the side window is essentially at eye level.
As real as it gets, I guess. :uncomfortableness:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top