falcon409
SOH-CM-2026
Right, as does ADE. When you draw the flatten poly you can set it to allow adjustments to each node of the poly if necessary. I assume that's what you're referring to?
-
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
1U1_Moose Creek
- Thread starter falcon409
- Start date
sidler
Charter Member
Mario Donadon
Members +
that would be it, in short I just said nonsense, hshshshshs
hawkdriver
Charter Member
Ed,Another FINE airfield/ airstrip. Thank you so much for your mini Idaho Back county airstrip series. Rob
falcon409
SOH-CM-2026
Great pic Sidler. I was just telling someone that I had the Bushawk as well and honestly liked the detailing and how it flew but with Trackir I had a choice of either adjusting the eyepoint so I could see over the cowling and not be able to see out the left window. . .or adjust it down to see out the window and have no fwd vision at all. Finally uninstalled it.
falcon409
SOH-CM-2026
I agree, it flies great in FSX as well, but I'm used to being able to look to the left and visually see the flaps extension or at least the wing. You can't do that with the Bushawk because the airplane is designed with the pilot sitting higher than the top edge of the window so you have to bend down low enough to see out the window if you want to look back to the left. Basically take a Cub, a Pacer, any high wing airplane and you can easily look left and see the wing. The Bushawk isn't that way and for me it takes a real getting used to to enjoy an otherwise beautiful Bush Plane.
MZee1960
SOH-CM-2023
My CT206H Stationair from Carenado is like you described above. A truly stunning aircraft otherwise.
I have mine set up to see comfortably out the front, and only about 40 or so feet through the left hand side window - the top bar of the side window is essentially at eye level.
As real as it gets, I guess.
