Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
That was actually pretty funny. Thanks for the fun.Yes. It means "I'm pretty much done, but I want everybody to think it's only halfway done so they'll think I'm a better painter. Any flak or pointers I get can then be dismissed as something I haven't done yet so I can get free proofreading with no hit ot my pride."
I'm just kidding, guys. If I had half the artistic talent that some of you guys had, I'd try to paint myself.:ernae:
an artist is only as good as his canvas.
Do you know the word rhetorical?
kc

Thanks Michael. The template is a big problem when the cutting is a big mess with distortion and other buggy stuff.
That was the case with the Dauphin, the canvas was not the best I've seen. It's because I couldn't give the best for the texture set.
I remember some of your models that were a real pleasure to work on due to the perfect cutting of the 3D on the canvas:ernae:
So for everybody, keep that in mind, we make what we can with what we have..
Remi,
A good clean tidy mesh with neat orderly polys is critical to good modeling and texturing, sadly I seem to be alone banging that drum and have all but given up with some AS imports, people just dont listen anymore and you'll find people ending up in the position you are in, struggling.
I have not seen the raw Dauphin mesh ( but have seen the sim model, so have seen enough to forumlate an accurate idea of whats under the skin), but I have seen the C-17 and the latest previews confirm its fundamentally the same external model, both yourself and Pierre will have your work cut out to meet even your own exacting standards, best of luck.
Best
Michael