• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

What aircraft do you think is missing from FSX?

what is missing from FSX?

  • Total voters
    125
Piglet is right; there are obviously too many persons wanting things and too few to create things. And I wonder whether we really need these aircrafts or just want them.

However I think this poll is incomplete! There is no you can't tick WWI aircrafts. When my memory is correct there are currently 3 genuine FSX WWI aircrafts......

Cheers,
Huub
 
MirageIII2009 said:
I think this one would be great in the FSX living museum : The Supermarine S.6B, a wonderful racing seaplane of the early thirties.
Supermarine_S.6B_ExCC.jpg

For those who love the Spitfire (which has already been modelled for FSX I guess... ) here is the Wikipedia link to the Supermarine S.6B).
I am afraid this kind of airplane is not as popular as the Spitfire, P51, Bf109 etc etc etc etc...
Click to expand...

This, this! Schneider Trophy for Acceleration racing :)

Beside this, I'd love to see MiG-29, Su-25, Mi-24 and Su-33 with Admiral Kuznetsov carrier. Accusim/Dodosim/VRS quality please :)
 
reply

Bjoern, the Cal Classics C-46 is NOT compatible with FSX SP2. I've tried it and had the usual prop disc / cloud problem.
 
skyhawka4m said:
There is a nice RV coming along nicely!
Click to expand...

I think Kiwi meant this as a joke. I think he's a part of the team doing the RV.



empeck said:
Accusim/Dodosim/VRS quality please :)
Click to expand...

Another thing that bugs me about requests...why do they always have to be highest quality and best of the best?

If I'd do a MiG-29 with standard aircrft system depth, would you throw it away or happily ignore it?

Can't we just be happy about having the aircraft in the first place?



Paul K said:
Bjoern, the Cal Classics C-46 is NOT compatible with FSX SP2. I've tried it and had the usual prop disc / cloud problem.
Click to expand...

|
v

kilo delta said:
Hence "compatible" and not "native" ;)
Click to expand...
 
Bjoern said:
Another thing that bugs me about requests...why do they always have to be highest quality and best of the best?

Can't we just be happy about having the aircraft in the first place?
Click to expand...

To be honest, no. There, I said it. I am not happy when a developer doesn't do an aircraft I like to the best standards out there. It is even worse because there's rarely room for another developer to do it better since the FS market is so small. If someone screws up a payware 172 (for example), there's little/no room for another developer to spend the money and time to make a nice one. The returns just aren't there. So it does excite me when those "highest quality" teams announce projects and show previews, because I know they will be the best.

Note this only applies to payware... and I do vote with my wallet.
 
Another thing that bugs me about requests...why do they always have to be highest quality and best of the best?
Click to expand...
Well, when ya dream, might as well dream BIG! But it won't neccesarily get your fave plane made..
 
I would love to see a native B737-100/200 for FSX. I know it's not a military aircraft but i love "her".
If we talk about military aircraft i'd like to fly a Gloster Meteor and some soviet aircrafts (really left behind).

Cheers!
Ignacio
 
Bjoern said:
If I'd do a MiG-29 with standard aircrft system depth, would you throw it away or happily ignore it?
Click to expand...

Depends. If it would be a nice freeware, like Piglets planes I'd be more than happy. If it's payware, I'd ignore it.
 
somthing that hasn't been done before ! - the supermarine is a lovely example
or some thing that hasn't been done in many many years - so an update is in order.
something unique but not obscure. something ..... something .....

... and yes i'll have to build it myself
 
HD presume you mean Faichild 24? A Staggerwing and Reliant SR-9 would be nice as would a Waco YMF-5

Theres tons more..where do you start...some of these suppose to be in development but heres some:

P-40E/M/N
Sea Fury
F-27-500
Fairchild Metro
Beech Baron (default doesnt count)
BAe J-31
Cessna 402/404/414/421
Piper Aztec
737-200
Lear 35
Saab 340
Cessna 210
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top