FSX Pilatus PC-21 from Iris Simulations

I recall seeing a recent Facebook post by David that he hoped to get it finished next month. Whether that happens or not .....?
 
Someone was working on the Yak-130, which the M-346 is mostly a copy of. I know it's not the same, but you could still paint it as such. ;)
 
New pictures was added:

http://www.facebook.com/irissimulations#!/irissimulations

Nice VC with scratches and dust on MFD.

706078_10151277634012416_238726591_o.jpg
 
never seen such straight lines / symmetrical scratches on every single glass in the same cockpit ever.. not really authentic
 
snow_white said:
never seen such straight lines / symmetrical scratches on every single glass in the same cockpit ever.. not really authentic
Click to expand...

Maybe there'll be an option to turn the scratches on/off (like Carenado has). I personally like non-reflective, non-scratched glass surfaces. I find them generally too distracting. Mostly transparent glass with just the ever so ssssslightest hint of wear, tint, and reflection for me please. :cool:
 
DaveKDEN said:
True... however, some people also just like to express their preferences when it comes to payware add-ons.
Click to expand...

Believe me I am for bringing up what we like and don't like -- I was pretty vocal about how the Razbam Harrier flies like crap while most people were pleased as punch with it and were more than willing to make excuses for it. But here, someone says Iris makes interior panels that look like plastic, then, when they put dust and scratches on the displays they complain about that.
 
airattackimages said:
Believe me I am for bringing up what we like and don't like -- I was pretty vocal about how the Razbam Harrier flies like crap while most people were pleased as punch with it and were more than willing to make excuses for it. But here, someone says Iris makes interior panels that look like plastic, then, when they put dust and scratches on the displays they complain about that.
Click to expand...

Agreed - some tend to be over the top with their complaints. There is a fine line between constructive criticism and downright complaining. However, I don't think we need to walk on egg shells when it comes to criticizing payware developers. When you're paying your hard earned money, you can and should expect high quality.
 
skyhawka4m said:
I'll wait for the full version....who wants to fly a plane with no cockpits and blacked out windows.......uuuuggghhh
Click to expand...

I will do the same !
Waiting for the full priced version.

I have big hope for this FSX Payware project but I am a little bit disappointed with IRIS's marketing approach about it !

I will then buy another "Christmas" paware.
Probably the MilViz T-38 Talon
:kilroy:
VaporZ
 
As much as I am looking forward to this aircraft, I will wait. I can't see spending $30 for a half finished neutered product.
 
jmig said:
As much as I am looking forward to this aircraft, I will wait. I can't see spending $30 for a half finish neutered product.
Click to expand...

+1

and why on earth is a product you have to pay for time limited ?????

Quote from the product page: Time limited to 1 hour use
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top