• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

FSX Pilatus PC-21 from Iris Simulations

I recall seeing a recent Facebook post by David that he hoped to get it finished next month. Whether that happens or not .....?
 
Someone was working on the Yak-130, which the M-346 is mostly a copy of. I know it's not the same, but you could still paint it as such. ;)
 
New pictures was added:

http://www.facebook.com/irissimulations#!/irissimulations

Nice VC with scratches and dust on MFD.

706078_10151277634012416_238726591_o.jpg
 
never seen such straight lines / symmetrical scratches on every single glass in the same cockpit ever.. not really authentic
 
never seen such straight lines / symmetrical scratches on every single glass in the same cockpit ever.. not really authentic

Maybe there'll be an option to turn the scratches on/off (like Carenado has). I personally like non-reflective, non-scratched glass surfaces. I find them generally too distracting. Mostly transparent glass with just the ever so ssssslightest hint of wear, tint, and reflection for me please. :cool:
 
True... however, some people also just like to express their preferences when it comes to payware add-ons.

Believe me I am for bringing up what we like and don't like -- I was pretty vocal about how the Razbam Harrier flies like crap while most people were pleased as punch with it and were more than willing to make excuses for it. But here, someone says Iris makes interior panels that look like plastic, then, when they put dust and scratches on the displays they complain about that.
 
Believe me I am for bringing up what we like and don't like -- I was pretty vocal about how the Razbam Harrier flies like crap while most people were pleased as punch with it and were more than willing to make excuses for it. But here, someone says Iris makes interior panels that look like plastic, then, when they put dust and scratches on the displays they complain about that.

Agreed - some tend to be over the top with their complaints. There is a fine line between constructive criticism and downright complaining. However, I don't think we need to walk on egg shells when it comes to criticizing payware developers. When you're paying your hard earned money, you can and should expect high quality.
 
I'll wait for the full version....who wants to fly a plane with no cockpits and blacked out windows.......uuuuggghhh

I will do the same !
Waiting for the full priced version.

I have big hope for this FSX Payware project but I am a little bit disappointed with IRIS's marketing approach about it !

I will then buy another "Christmas" paware.
Probably the MilViz T-38 Talon
:kilroy:
VaporZ
 
As much as I am looking forward to this aircraft, I will wait. I can't see spending $30 for a half finished neutered product.
 
As much as I am looking forward to this aircraft, I will wait. I can't see spending $30 for a half finish neutered product.

+1

and why on earth is a product you have to pay for time limited ?????

Quote from the product page: Time limited to 1 hour use
 
Back
Top