Does anyone have experience with or an opinion about this product?
http://www.pointsoftware.de/proatcx_e/index.html
http://www.pointsoftware.de/proatcx_e/index.html
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
Yea, same here. If it's not too cumbersome, I wouldn't mind anything that could do a better job than the default ATC.I'm curious too. After my 3rd fly over 'maintain 3,100 ft and expect vectors', I cancelled IFR plans and landed. The FSX ATC is so weird sometimes!
I've been following a pretty long thread about ProATC at another sim site. Seems the product is still in development and has a number of flaws and shortcomings that the developer intends to address.
Yep, use that all the time. . .but it doesn't cure the built in incompetence of the AI Controllers, lol.falcon, you might try ringing some changes for free with Editvoicepack
best,
nio
Yea, that's one of many, lol"Flight plan cleared as filed", then no more than 30 seconds of flight without a course correction and possibly never vectors or clearance to land. Is that what you are referring to Falcon409

I remember a number of years ago trying out a program that tied in real people acting as controllers with FS pilots. Is that still around?