• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

A2A Spitfire out!

I have a question for you guys.
Have a look at these, almost identical, shots (preferably in full-size):

FX9598.jpg


FX9597.jpg


I have been playing a bit with the base textures, and wonder if it's worth it..
the pics show my first paint for the Spit, and one I'm playing with at the moment.
Apart from the differences in registration (and the name and orange triangle), which one looks better do you think? Why? Or do you see no difference?
 
I slightly prefer the less scratched (darker green?) look of the upper picture.

BTW, the codes extend into the canopy line on both (is this correct?)

Nice work anyway.

Cheers

Paul
 
Ya I prefer the second one a little bit more... gives the impression of a thinner coat of flat paint.
 
I can definitely see the differences in the paints. As mentioned, the second pictures is much more weathered. The dirt on the cowling is the first thing I noticed. I like it.
 
Jan Kees of course I'm biased, as it an aircraft from 322 (Dutch) squadron, but I prefer the second one ;)

Cheers,
Huub
 
jankees said:
I have a question for you guys.
Have a look at these, almost identical, shots (preferably in full-size):

I have been playing a bit with the base textures, and wonder if it's worth it..
the pics show my first paint for the Spit, and one I'm playing with at the moment.
Apart from the differences in registration (and the name and orange triangle), which one looks better do you think? Why? Or do you see no difference?
Click to expand...

I really like the extra weathering, gives a more worn appearance that I feel would be more typical of wartime aircraft. I particularly like the fact that it is more pronounced on the walkways, a realistic touch.

One thing I would point out is that you need to be very careful at the areas where the textures join at the top of the nose and the wing leading edges.

Have a look at this edited version of your image to see what I mean. I circled the offending area to make it easier to spot. The edge of the dirt/smudge has a visible straight edge that looks unrealistic. Admitedly you have to look hard to spot it but once you see it it always draws your attention... or maybe it's just me being anal. IMHO when painting over the texture joins it is important that the opposing halves match perfectly.

The only problem is that it is really really tedious to do :)
 
Yes I like Nathans paints. although he seems to have a few Mk's that are later than the I's and II's in his collection.

I may be wrong, and please correct me if I am, but I thought that the only serials with double letters for the I's or II's were in the AR2xx series. The BR serials I think are mainly MkV's.
 
Will look into that

glennc said:
Maybe help, maybe not. I have a Logitech G940. If I don't check it, FSX tries to assign a function for any setting to all three pieces so I end up the three different parking brakes, two or three different elevator trim controls and so on. I still have that happening in Slew mode so the sim goes crazy if I hit "Y". It would be worth going through the FSX control settings and be sure your elevator trim is assigned to only one controller device and one key stroke.

Glenn
Click to expand...


Thanks Glenn I will check your suggestion ASAP Thanks for the helpful tip..

Ol'Jarhead:wavey:
 
Quixoticish said:
Is anyone going to do a lovely high gloss restored P7350, the Battle of Britain Memorial Flights Mk IIa? I might even be tempted to part with my hard earned pennies and pick this up. :)

http://www.raf.mod.uk/bbmf/theaircraft/spitfirep7350.cfm
Click to expand...

Ditto that.

I'd like a glossy restored look also. As said previously it feels more real to fly such an example in the modern world of FSX than a battle worn BoB example. I have to admit all those repaints look great though.:ernae:
 
Thanks for the input guys!
It seems most people like a slightly more weathered look, and I just so happens I do too, so I'll continue down that road.
As for shiny restored versions, that is not my thing, so if you prefer that look, I'm afraid you'll have to look elsewhere, sorry.
 
Well, I finally parted with the readies and downloaded this gorgeous bird last night. Loaded her up and took her for her first flight tonight. A2A this is a great aircraft. Attached is the screen shot of my first landing. Not quite a 3 pointer but close enough. Probably the best landing I will do. However I then c'd it up by blowing the engine. Forgot to read the landing check list (you know how check lists are for blouses) and forgot to open the radiator flaps. Taxiing in and pow.

View attachment 30326

Oh well, better luck next time. But for now its off to the maintenance hanger. New prop, new engine, new pilot.

Paul
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top