• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

A2A, what's next?

Most likely an accusimed p-51... and they have long talked about accusiming the p-40 which would be my top choice, along with accusiming the 109. but id bet it goes p-51, f-4, then maybe the Dora sometime late next year.....
 
rwmarth said:
Most likely an accusimed p-51... and they have long talked about accusiming the p-40 which would be my top choice, along with accusiming the 109. but id bet it goes p-51, f-4, then maybe the Dora sometime late next year.....
Click to expand...

how much you want that bet to be? :engel016:
 
I'm praying it's the Phantom.

I feel like there have only been a few top quality military jets made for FSX.

Aerosoft F-16, Lotus L-39, VRS F/A-18E (comes out on the 8th)

Granted there are many great FSX jets, they don't fall into the above category of detail/performance.

A2A...take my breath awayyyyyyyyyyy! ;)
 
OH an Accu-simed P-40...((((faint)))) my dream!
Ted
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
Kiwikat said:
It would be an epic fail huh? It would sell more than all of their other accusim packages combined. Easily.

Many SOH members may not like the t00bs, but they sell.

Personally, I want to see an Accusim Bonanza and Accusim T-6. There still isn't a T-6 out that meets my needs (wants). I'd settle for a T-28 though.
Click to expand...


precisely. Sad but true.
 
I have to admit I have been among the tube haters but only because I never owned a payware tube. Since getting the Captain Sim 727, I have had a change of heart. I to would like to see an accusim jet tube, but the P-40 is my first and best choice. I used to live down the block from Tex Hill the famous AVG pilot. His stories of the P-40 and the AVG always got my blood pumping! An Accusim P-40 would make even OL' Tex's heart leap. I miss the old man...Godspeed Tex
Ted
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
You're all wrong! It's gotta be DC-4, -6, and -7. Accusimmed and all. That'll be 12 vibrating engine cowlings at start-up.


_______:jump:_:jump:_ :icon34:_:jump:_:jump:_______


_______:jump:_:jump:_ :icon34:_:jump:_:jump:_______

cheers,
jan
 
Keep it multi-propellery. They are far more interesting aircraft and by their nature allow Accusim to replicate so much more in terms of controls, systems, failures etc than jets.

Transports: DC-4, C-46, C-119

Military: B-29, B-24 / PB4Y-2, Lancaster

Be the king of vintage prop-jobs, A2A.


( Although if you did a B-47, I would forgive you )
 
I think the earlier suggestion of a Beaver is excellent. I really like the idea of having to maintain that workhorse. Maybe something along the lines of DA's Dornier, only ramped up a lot more.
 
I'd like to see to see a new P-51D. maybe with a clickable option that allows you to choose for a modern day pilot or WWII era pilot. And as a nice surprise a backseat passenger that screems when you do aerobatics?

regards,

Meso
 
keep pumping on the F4- with the accusim, this would be super fine - :salute:

Many Cheers - :ernae:
 
How about a generic AccuSim package .. that can be added to any airplane model ? Or maybe AccuSim packages designed for exisiting, popular models ?

I, for one, would pay upwards of $1,000 for a 'user programmable' Accusim, that I could fit to my favorite models. :wiggle:
 
They accu-sim all their WW2 European war birds and stick them in the Merlin Engine and create a "As Real As It Gets" Combat Sim!

:jump:
 
A quick reply to Brett_Henderson's idea of a generic Accusim.

I worked at the SF office of Domark software back in the mid 90's. They were the publishers of Flight Sim Toolkit, which was suppose to be a software package that allowed folks to build their own flight simulator. When I first started working there I asked about FST and how well it had done. Not very well and a huge customer support nightmare was the answer. I imagine the same results would happen with a Accusim toolkit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top