• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

About Accusim and what it means to all of us

Just to keep things this in perspective - the 377 and Accusim are our most popular products to date, even more than the P51. However, we have always struck a balance between making aircraft we are passionate about and popularity. Take the He219 for example. This is an aircraft of pure passion. We ride the line because we love what we do.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:eek:ffice" /><o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
Accu-Sim is also not about making things hard, it’s about making things real. Personally, I want to manipulate the supercharger in the P51. I want to move the intercooler levers in the B17. I want to open a radiator flap and get the proper result. This is what drives AccuSim – just making things as they are.

This is why I will buy it - and why I hope you guys will make an Accusimpack that can be applied to any (or certain) models in a kind of generic, open application...

I would love to have this measure of access and control over an F-14 or an Osprey or any number of other aircraft - not that I don't like the 377 or other multi-engined machinery...just that I want totally realistic controls and consequences over smaller crew or single crewed aircraft.
 
As long as the option to turn it OFF remains, that's okay with me. :mixedsmi:

When ya' try to get a quick flight in after the kiddies go to bed & before you have to go to bed, and you're going to fly an aircraft ya' haven't flown in a while, it's nice every once in a while to just crank & burn...:cost1:

That's where a "Save Flight...." comes in....simply get the bird
ready for takeoff and save the situation. Then when you want that
'quick flight' just load that saved flight, take a quick look around the cockpit,
taxi on to the active and go....

After logging more than 100 hours in the B-377, I can't imagine
flying it with Accusim turned off....

=GB=
 
What if I don't want to fly from the same location next time around ? ;)


To each their own though...I'm looking forward to Accusim and single seaters :) - Like some of the others have posted, I don't have that much interest in being an Flight Engineer...
 
I don't own it or plan to own it. The attraction to me would be if it would be applied to any and all planes that you fly in the sim. If I enjoyed it that much and it was that good, it would not make any sense in flying anything other then the plane it was attached to. Accusim sounds like a great idea, that should be applied to the sim and not to a specific plane.
 
Blade124 said:
Accu-Sim is also not about making things hard, it’s about making things real. Personally, I want to manipulate the supercharger in the P51. I want to move the intercooler levers in the B17. I want to open a radiator flap and get the proper result. This is what drives AccuSim – just making things as they are.

Thats why I almost don't fly combat sims these days. Planes in those games do fly in virtual air, but they doesn't work as they should...

Black Shark is going to be simulator of both combat and a plane, but it's not a WW2 sim :(

I have 377 with AccuSim and I love both. I wish I had more time to fly it though.
 
What if I don't want to fly from the same location next time around ? ;)


To each their own though...I'm looking forward to Accusim and single seaters :) - Like some of the others have posted, I don't have that much interest in being an Flight Engineer...


Load the saved flight, thus the aircraft state, then change airports....

Paul
 
Thanks but as I stated earlier,
I'm not interested in being a FE & CP...

Single-seaters & Accusim is what I'm waiting for...:mixedsmi:
 
Ted,

I had written a long winded rambling letter explaining my most inner thoughts on the subject of Accusim.................then i read Panther's statement...

"Thanks but as I stated earlier,
I'm not interested in being a FE & CP...

Single-seaters & Accusim is what I'm waiting for...:mixedsmi:"

I threw out my long letter......Panther says it for me also.

Regards
Steve
 
Hey Guys,
No one here is arguing that you must purchase the B377 or Accusim. Accusim had to be developed first on something. Scott chose the most difficult of aircraft to do Accusim for and that in itself makes this aircraft earth-shattering. I hate tube-liners, but love the B-377. I didn't at first. It took a little warming up to the idea of flying anything that big. I also can hardly wait to get my hands on a single or twin prop anything with Accusim.

I will repeat myself again. No one in here has seen the new Accusim Service Pack I, so all arguments against Accusim are moot points as many changes took place. Scott gathered a crack team of beta testers to ensure that SP1 delivers what Accusim is all about. I grant that the big four-engine aircraft is not going to excite everyone, just like learning to fly accurately and precisely is not going to please everyone either...and frankly I don't really care-as Panther said, to each his own. As a real world pilot this new development excites me. It is exactly what I was hoping to see come to pass with FSX as I can no longer fly the government controlled skies except in an ultralight..which I also love:jump::jump::jump:

I was merely pointing out that Accusim Service Pack I delivers the bacon...and that the development of it is probably way beyond anything Microsoft had even imagined possible, as Scott had to go way beyond SDK and do his own coding. He and his team deserve our appreciation for an incredible feat done for us.

The other part of this thread is that it could only have been done in FSX and that in itself makes FSX very valuable for those who want the capability of Accusim modeling. Who knows where the boundaries really are now?

Ted
 
...The other part of this thread is that it could only have been done in FSX and that in itself makes FSX very valuable for those who want the capability of Accusim modeling. Who knows where the boundaries really are now? Ted

That's what's interesting considering the criticism FSX has taken over the couple years since it was introduced. Turns out it's good enough, capable enough, to allow something like Accusim to be be developed as an addon.
 
I think there may be a little bit of misunderstanding as to what Accusim does to your flight work load in an aircraft like the B377.

I don't ever find myself feeling like I have to be the engineer or the co-pilot. I spend about as much time being the plane 'ol pilot as in just about any equivilant aircraft that I have that isn't Accusim'd.

If you follow proper pre-flight procedures and have all your ducks in a row before you even start to taxi for take-off, the rest of the flight should be fairly straight forward and panic free.

A great percentage of the perceived extra Accusim brain damage is something you better have figured out and sorted through before you throttle up. :)

IMO Once she's off the ground and skyward bound, the B377 fully Accusim'd is one of the most enjoyable and interesting aircraft I've flown in any sim ever. I don't move around constantly from position to position because it's required, I do it, because I enjoy all the views. For much of a flight I may just campout back in the FE seat because it has the best view of all, plus I can glance over to see how things are looking.

Even the FE panel as imposing as it looks isn't gauge after gauge of disasters waiting to happen. Most of the time all your doing is looking to see if maybe a tweak here or a tweak there to a cowl or flap might get a little more kick out of the engines.

If you find yourself constantly fighting to keep from frying an engine or toasting a set of turbo bearings then my best advice would be to land as quickly as possible and do a little more reading. :)

If you tend to be one of the bearing fryer & engine toaster variety of pilot, one thing to be really thankful for with the B377 versus a single engine Accusim aircraft, is that you still have 3 more engines to figure out what you aren't doing correctly before you crash. As best as I can guess an Accusim equipped P-47 will still have a really sucky glide ratio when you fry your one and only. :)

Back to being only slightly more serious :) ... I have racked up quite a few hours in the 377 on long hauls, short hauls, really bad weather at night and no land in sight for days types of flights. I can count the Accusim induced panic moments on less than one hand. It may sound odd, but I enjoyed every panic moment and the thumbs up I gave myself when I landed safely or figured the problem out.

What Accusim has done for me is to bring back the original level of excitement I had when I first got into flight simming years ago. Back then I thought how cool it was going to be to "really" learn how to fly a machine. Unfortunantly after 50 or 60 different flight sims over the years that original excitement became tempered by the fact that most of the aircraft in most of the sims are little more than point-n-gos. The only sim aircraft and cockpit that managed to hold my imagination and facination for any length of time, was the F-16 in the Falcon series. Ten years in that cockpit and there was still plently to learn. All those years and I never got bored of being in that jet headed out on a mission and that was in large part to it's cockpit systems complexity.

Now I finally have a civi-sim ride that's just as interesting and goes a long ways in rekindling some of my original facination with flight simming that had become a little faded and jaded over the years.
 
I'd like to see Accusim in the B-17, B-24 and B-29..... plus some other things that we need for MP. Scott knows what they are, and hopefully someday it could happen with FSX..... someday.
 
I'm impressed with Accusim for two reasons -

1. For what it offers and adds to the B377 and any future A2A aircraft with much added depth to the simulation experience. If one doesn't require that depth then either switch it off or don't buy it in the first place. For those of us who do like depth then it's a must. I hope other developers follow A2A's lead and develop similar enhancements.

2. Accusim demomstrates what can be acheived using the SimConnect interface and is a very good example of the type of application MS intented SimConnect could be used for. MS Aces have stated in the past that SimConnect could be used to completely program an entire aircraft flight model outside the FS FM system. So far Aces haven't provided much in the way examples that could be used by us mere mortals who develop for FS, though I believe that if one is an accredited MSDN developer developing for ESP they will make this information available.

Anyway A2A have to be lauded and applauded for taking the initiative and investing the time and the money in developing Accusim and extending the FS platform. :ernae::applause:
 
If you follow proper pre-flight procedures and have all your ducks in a row before you even start to taxi for take-off, the rest of the flight should be fairly straight forward and panic free.

Yeah, until you find little surprises like the windows fogging up!! I gotta admit, that was cool and unique. I was scrambling around trying to figure out what was going on until I discovered that the defog knob worked.....The rest is history.:applause:

Oh, and the various braking noises under differing brake loads were pure genius!!
 
That's what's interesting considering the criticism FSX has taken over the couple years since it was introduced. Turns out it's good enough, capable enough, to allow something like Accusim to be be developed as an addon.
And i bet there would be much more possible (ATC, environmental influences, AI objects and many more).
 
I kinda get a morbid enjoyment out of making the passengers scream:costumes:
Ted

Is it just me, or does anyone else hear what sounds like the passengers groaning when you do a bouncy or rough landing. It's definitly not clapping and it's not the panic screams when crashing. It's more like muffled complaining and groaning sort of like they are implying "Is that the best you can do?" :)
 
Is it just me, or does anyone else hear what sounds like the passengers groaning when you do a bouncy or rough landing. It's definitly not clapping and it's not the panic screams when crashing. It's more like muffled complaining and groaning sort of like they are implying "Is that the best you can do?" :)
You are not hearing things FAC...err...well actually you are. :icon_lol:

The groaning passengers are there along with several different versions of the screaming passengers which are selected at random so that they don't become too repetitive.
 
There are more things going on with Accusim than in some cases some of us guys at A2A can even remember on a single saying. With over 400 some odd revisions (sometimes containing more than one update, bug fix or otherwise) and development for over a year, this plane surprises ME sometimes when I take it up!

Just take a look at the sound files provided. I'm willing to bet that there are quite a few that some of you guys have never heard.
 
Back
Top