Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

I sent them an email begging them to not use the large missles they show on the inboard pylons of the one screenshot. They were hardly ever used.
I jst don't get why these companies that do "modern" jet fighters go for the odd load outs and not the more common ones. All I want is an A-4 with a centerline tank, or one with two wing tanks, or one with all three wing tanks.....correctly shaped and sized. very simple.......
I also have to check but it looks like they have Bullpups mounted to Shrike pylons.
And you probably won't get one. If you want to get word to Virtavia quickly say it here and/or PM Mal998 or myself. We can get the message delivered and we will get a response. We're the eyes and the ears so to speak.no repsonse at all.......still waiting
I personally like the third option. That way any version can carry any load or not, even those rare loads.Did you get a response? I would expect a state of the art FSX model to have one of these features:
1) loadout panel (like RAZBAM A-7, Vertigo F9F Panther)
2) simple loadout on/off switch (like the jettison stores switch in the Virtavia F-111)
3) loadouts can be customized by adjusting the station weights in the FSX Payload screen (like freeware UKMIL Buccaneer)
I personally like the third option. That way any version can carry any load or not, even those rare loads.
:ernae:
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input jscode="leoInternalChangeDone()" onclick="if(typeof(jsCall)=='function'){jsCall();}else{setTimeout('jsCall()',500);}" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
Word from the Boss is all structures will be visible from the VC.