Interesting that Nebessar seemed to have a 'trademark' approach to engine mounts. Like the Type 51, the Type 57 wing-mounted engines had a thrustline angled down compared to the center one which seemed to be online with the fuselage ref. line. It's quite noticeable in the "Flight" photo.
Also, when it comes to the 'details' phase Milton, there seems to be a small single eyebrow bump for an intake at the top front of each cowl. Letting my squinty old eyes squint a bit more, it appears to just be a formed bump with an extended induction tube mounted to the engine, not a full "scoop".
Wish there were more pics as the wing fairing looks huge and rather unusual in the first photo (left side view) - indeed like a separate piece grafted on
Yes Sir, I have noticed the same regarding the engine mounts. I do have the wing mounts engine centerline below the wings' leading edge. If pointed pointed downward, I cannot verify that. It is hard to assess without knowing the wing NACA and the degrees of incidence. That looks pretty strong to me.
Yes, I have observed the intake for some time now; I just haven't gotten to it yet. There is also a very strange exhaust port on the far sides of the nacelles, shaped about like a whiskey flask for toting, very wide and narrow, almost flat.
The wing fairings are huge and quite unlike the typical one seen on the DC3 or Connie. But without better pictures, I will be somewhat reserved in that depiction.
I am curious if there are guidelines/rules of thumb for wing mounted engines, especially in these configurations, just how far from the fuselage they should be mounted. What are the deciding factors?
Also looking for input on cabin appointments.