Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
Just when you think you have everything running some what better...
You get a message from the Hosting company. Short story they need to move us to a new server. I have been working with them to plan a good date for all concerned. Here is what we have come up with as a schedule.
If all goes well we should be back online on November 8th.
To keep you updated we will post updates on AVSIM forums.
Thank you for your support.
Well, an unfortunate update - the N51Z/XP-51 type paint scheme won't work, as the canopy framing, which should be bare metal, shares a common area as a section of the top of the cowlings where the OD glare shield is. I will still try and see if an RAF paint scheme might work well enough.
jk10329 by JanKees Blom, on FlickrWell, an unfortunate update - the N51Z/XP-51 type paint scheme won't work, as the canopy framing, which should be bare metal, shares a common area as a section of the top of the cowlings where the OD glare shield is. I will still try and see if an RAF paint scheme might work well enough.
My prayers are answered!I've got a basic polished metal paint scheme on the P-51A now, in the beginning of my process of working on recreating the current paint scheme and finish of Dusty Dowd's "P-51A" 43-6006, N51Z, which has been made out to look like XP-51 '1039'. Next will be the silver-painted elements, followed by the markings.
There is no god!Well, an unfortunate update - the N51Z/XP-51 type paint scheme won't work, as the canopy framing, which should be bare
metal, shares a common area as a section of the top of the cowlings where the OD glare shield is. I will still try and see if an RAF paint scheme might work well enough.
Well, an unfortunate update - the N51Z/XP-51 type paint scheme won't work, as the canopy framing, which should be bare metal, shares a common area as a section of the top of the cowlings where the OD glare shield is. I will still try and see if an RAF paint scheme might work well enough.
So I highly doubt they give 2 shakes about repaintability. Hopefully that's not true. But seems like they're trying to pump out as much content as possible....it'll be hard to keep it all quality controlled at this pace.
jk10346 by JanKees Blom, on Flickr
jk10356Apparently it was just some stuff for the racing part, and nothing with any of the airplanes.
Funny, several people employed exploites to gain an unfair advantage in the game. Halarious, because it is not that good of a race simulation.Indeed, only the folder "asobo-airrace-renorace-ui" was updated.PS Found the change-log:https://forums.flightsimulator.com/...air-races-update-statement-on-cheating/477807
If there's a competition, someone will always find a way to cheat. The leaderboards on the landing challenges are a perfect example. I consider myself a decent pilot, but at best, I usually get a low six-digit score on most of those challenges. So how the heck to people post scores in the high seven-digit range? I don't even bother with them anymore...Funny, several people employed exploites to gain an unfair advantage in the game. Halarious, because it is not that good of a race simulation.
Go back into your settings where you picked a different default pilot and restore that to default. It should allow the sim to use the pilot included with the plane.