• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

MilViz 310R Redux released

Dimus

Dimus

SOH-CM-2025
A much updated, refreshed and highly realistic version of the MilViz 310R has been released:

http://milviz.com/flight/products/310_redux/

It includes the Trueglass, Realight, REX/MilViz WXR and much more:

31.jpg


44.jpg


There is a discount offered if you own the previous version.
 
Even with the discount, I am mulling whether to spend almost what a new aircraft costs when I already have this one and it flies in P3Dv4 fine and the enhancements seem pretty minor or subtle ones. Other devs offer customers these kinds of updates - and sometimes more - for free. I also prefer Rob Richardson's short nosed 310's to the long nosed ones. Different strokes . .
 
expat said:
Even with the discount, I am mulling whether to spend almost what a new aircraft costs when I already have this one and it flies in P3Dv4 fine and the enhancements seem pretty minor or subtle ones. Other devs offer customers these kinds of updates - and sometimes more - for free. I also prefer Rob Richardson's short nosed 310's to the long nosed ones. Different strokes . .
Click to expand...
Yep, with you on this one as well expat. I have the MilViz 310 but rarely fly it over the Rob Richardson version.
 
On the fence here with this one too. Does the new version have the "wicked" torque like the previous? Like the aircraft, but the way FSX has handled torque, it can get really "squirrelly" on TO & landing.

Thanks!

Bill
 
icycle said:
On the fence here with this one too. Does the new version have the "wicked" torque like the previous? Like the aircraft, but the way FSX has handled torque, it can get really "squirrelly" on TO & landing.

Thanks!

Bill
Click to expand...


yes, is does. I didn't like it too, so i eased out the effect by changing the engine position in the aircraft.cfg file.

[GeneralEngineData]
//0=Piston, 1=Jet, 2=None, 3=Helo-Turbine, 4=Rocket, 5=Turboprop
engine_type = 0
Engine.0 = 6.5, -5.8, 0.0
Engine.1 = 6.5, 5.8, 0.0 //6.5, 6.2, 0.0

Just make the value equal or the difference smaller , just the way you like it best.


Wim
 
I took a flight in Rob's C310B last night, I forgot how good it is. I am sure the Milviz version will be more detailed, but Rob's is good enough for my needs.
 
Wow, thank you for that. I feel quite silly, in not realizing that the engines were asymmetrically offset like that :banghead:. All this time flying the 310 "sideways"! works like a charm....

Bill


Wim said:
yes, is does. I didn't like it too, so i eased out the effect by changing the engine position in the aircraft.cfg file.

[GeneralEngineData]
//0=Piston, 1=Jet, 2=None, 3=Helo-Turbine, 4=Rocket, 5=Turboprop
engine_type = 0
Engine.0 = 6.5, -5.8, 0.0
Engine.1 = 6.5, 5.8, 0.0 //6.5, 6.2, 0.0

Just make the value equal or the difference smaller , just the way you like it best.


Wim
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top