More Meteors from Rob Richardson!

[Dev One]

Another view of '667.....


Looks as if its got a U16 nose cone - dont think it flew like that though!

 

[Matt Wynn]

I think she wants her belly tickled there.... and that does look like a U16 nosecone.... weren't there 2 or 3 T7's painted in that blue/white/grey scheme?

 

[peterwatkins2]

I think she wants her belly tickled there.... and that does look like a U16 nosecone.... weren't there 2 or 3 T7's painted in that blue/white/grey scheme?

I know of two - WA662 and XF274, both used by the RAE.

 

[Matt Wynn]

added another 2 today:

one is I 19 of the Koninklijke Luchtmacht, the other is Classic Air Forces Meteor T7, have done 8 or 9 paints now (just Finished an Israeli one), and still working towards a pack that'll include some fictitious schemes as well as real schemes...

 

[Dev One]

WA662 with the U16 nose cone - this aircraft was used as a ground based test bed for Cambridge Consultants/RAE Radar Vector Miss Distance Indicator prototype equipment. This photo is of it under test in the Farnborough Concorde Test hangar. It was then test flown on the Aberporth range installed in U16 WK800 (which I am in the process of creating for FS9) - WK800 is now resting at Old Sarum.
Keith

 

[Ferry_vO]

added another 2 today:

one is I 19 of the Koninklijke Luchtmacht, the other is Classic Air Forces Meteor T7, have done 8 or 9 paints now (just Finished an Israeli one), and still working towards a pack that'll include some fictitious schemes as well as real schemes...

Excellent work Matt!

 

[peterwatkins2]

Hi all. The Meteor T7.5 is now available at FlightSim.com!

Get it HERE!!!

 

[dhazelgrove]

That only leaves the FR.10 and the TT.20 - other than the "U" variants.

Dave

 

[spatialpro]

I would LOVE to see the U variants!!!

 

[robcarrich]

I would LOVE to see the U variants!!!

I'm Meteor'd out Andy!!

 

[peterwatkins2]

That only leaves the FR.10 and the TT.20 - other than the "U" variants.

Dave

Hmmm, what about the Mk 1 and the NF12?

 

[Wings of Gold]

FR.10 Please

The FR.10 is a "must have" airplane. It was the high altitude (strategic) photo version. The FR.9 was primarily a tactical recon (low altitude) version. PLEASE, we need this one.

Bill

 

[Dev One]

A U15 should be easy enough Peter, no external airframe difference!
U16 as said earlier is coming together complete with 'remote' control logic. Primarily for FS9, but it does port over to FSX, so far!
Keith

[Edit] Scrub that remark - I should have known better ! I forgot about the large camera pods on the U15!

 

[dhazelgrove]

I'm Meteor'd out Andy!!

I think we should be very grateful for what you have achieved, and I'm sure we all thank you for that.

Dave

 

[robcarrich]

I think we should be very grateful for what you have achieved, and I'm sure we all thank you for that.

Dave

Thank you Dave.

 

[spatialpro]

Definitely EXTREMELY grateful for all I/we have received thanks to Rob's superb efforts...

The FR.10 is a "must have" airplane. It was the high altitude (strategic) photo version. The FR.9 was primarily a tactical recon (low altitude) version. PLEASE, we need this one.

Bill

... but on the other hand I also second that...

 

[robcarrich]

The PR (as described in the R J Caruana book) Mk 10 is definitely one to think about.

 

[peterwatkins2]

Royal Navy Meteor T7

 

[robcarrich]

How about a Vid of the T Mk 7 in the Mach Loop?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/YFumaCO6cE8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


Rob R

 

[peterwatkins2]

A touch of dayglo!