More Meteors from Rob Richardson!

Another view of '667.....


Looks as if its got a U16 nose cone - dont think it flew like that though!
 
Last edited:
I think she wants her belly tickled there.... and that does look like a U16 nosecone.... weren't there 2 or 3 T7's painted in that blue/white/grey scheme?
 
added another 2 today:
2014-2-13_20-51-13-541_zps642d2795.jpg
2014-2-13_23-52-15-606_zps19ad8dc0.jpg


one is I 19 of the Koninklijke Luchtmacht, the other is Classic Air Forces Meteor T7, have done 8 or 9 paints now (just Finished an Israeli one), and still working towards a pack that'll include some fictitious schemes as well as real schemes...
 
WA662 with the U16 nose cone - this aircraft was used as a ground based test bed for Cambridge Consultants/RAE Radar Vector Miss Distance Indicator prototype equipment. This photo is of it under test in the Farnborough Concorde Test hangar. It was then test flown on the Aberporth range installed in U16 WK800 (which I am in the process of creating for FS9) - WK800 is now resting at Old Sarum.
Keith
 
Matt Wynn said:
added another 2 today:

one is I 19 of the Koninklijke Luchtmacht, the other is Classic Air Forces Meteor T7, have done 8 or 9 paints now (just Finished an Israeli one), and still working towards a pack that'll include some fictitious schemes as well as real schemes...
Click to expand...

Excellent work Matt! :encouragement:
 
FR.10 Please

The FR.10 is a "must have" airplane. It was the high altitude (strategic) photo version. The FR.9 was primarily a tactical recon (low altitude) version. PLEASE, we need this one.

Bill
 
A U15 should be easy enough Peter, no external airframe difference!
U16 as said earlier is coming together complete with 'remote' control logic. Primarily for FS9, but it does port over to FSX, so far!
Keith

[Edit] Scrub that remark - I should have known better ! I forgot about the large camera pods on the U15!
 
Definitely EXTREMELY grateful for all I/we have received thanks to Rob's superb efforts... :applause:

Wings of Gold said:
The FR.10 is a "must have" airplane. It was the high altitude (strategic) photo version. The FR.9 was primarily a tactical recon (low altitude) version. PLEASE, we need this one.

Bill
Click to expand...

... but on the other hand I also second that... :encouragement:
 
How about a Vid of the T Mk 7 in the Mach Loop?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/YFumaCO6cE8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


Rob R
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top