Hi Gius,
These are four of the River Seine bridges package for FS 2002 by Philippe Coutellier. They work in CFS 2 but when I converted them to library objects they vanished when you flew close to them.
Something along these lines would be good - especially with all the improvements KH mentioned above.
This is a wish-list and I realise it could turn into a big project so please don't feel obligated.
Cheers,
Kevin
Hi guys!
I have this pack too. It matches the stock CFS2 scenery, but it becomes a problem with SdC's ETO rivers and coastlines, and gets worse with Rhumba's corrected mesh and watermasks.
I noticed the disappearance, as well. This is a clear symptom of the object-size bug discovered by Pen32Win in Gary20's RAF buildings, which led Pen to rework their polygons and scale dimensions. If you remember his readme and the discussion that went on, when he announced the refurbish projects for Gary20's library, this bug also causes a significant degradation in fps performance, with rockets and bullets passing through without causing any damage, as if they were "ghost" objects. Another tale-telling symptom happens when standing on the ground and panning the view around: the faulty building/object disappears slightly before it should leave the screen either to the right or the left.
A word of advice to you Gius, Kdriver and Blood_Hawk23, then: if you are thinking to utilise this Paris bridge library to develop new bridge objects, watch out not to duplicate this nasty bug, which hides very well within a given scenery object and it can only be detected by the disappearence-when-close and the apparent impossibility to damage the object.
Ever since I started doing gsl work in the attempt to enhance the looks of available sceneries, I discovered that there are other popular object libraries out there with the same bug. One of them is Xaveirb2's Japanese/ETO hangars and some of his warehouses.
Gius, you might want to check before release your new ETO city objects as well, against the possible presence of this bug.
I always thought that since we are at it, we might as well try to do things in a way that an upgrade or correction at a later stage will not be necessary.
Cheers!
KH 