• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

The Ongoing Mystery Aircraft Thread Part Deux.

Thank you, Lefty.

Here is a lawnmower-cum-chicken coop:
attachment.php


Why does it attach the image twice?
 

Attachments

  • Chicken coop.jpg
    Chicken coop.jpg
    76.6 KB · Views: 12
Don't know why, Dan - seen a lot of this happening - is there a reason, though, that you have posted a negative ????
 

Attachments

  • Chicken coop.jpg
    Chicken coop.jpg
    127.8 KB · Views: 6
Okay, floundered a bit and then got the bright idea to count up the rotors (20). Did a search for "early helicopter 20 propellers".

Eventually tracked down the Kimball effort of 1908. It did not fly!

[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]<small>
(Wilbur R) Kimball Aircraft Corp, Naugatuck CT.</small>
cleardot.gif

1908 = 1pOH; 50hp Aero & Marine; rotors: 4'0". Empty wt: 112#, gross wt: 600#. Kimball had the bizarre belief that a large number of small rotors would be lighter than one large rotor of the same total disk area. Thus his helicopter had no less than 20 rotors covering an area of 320 sqft, belt-driven by the single motor. Drive system problems developed, not surprisingly, and the framelike machine never left the ground. It was later destroyed in a fire.

[/FONT]












 
Yes Moses, this is Wilbur R. Kimball's contraption. I have it as 1909, but it's probably the same.

Congrats and over to you. :very_drunk:
 
I have a soft spot for those odd early designs.


Here is a sturdy ship. Of course it's American, look at all the telephone poles!

t9s4mA5.jpg
 
Well France has surrendered en masse, Italy and Holland are sleeping, so it's :scotland: Ecosse to the rescue ! It's the Boyd Model C.
 
(1) point for the Scotsman.:very_drunk:

Final standings on the Boyd C:

Scotland 1
France 0
Italy N/A
Holland N/A

:triumphant:

BTW- Where has Green been?
 
Hi Kevin:encouragement:
Italy and Holland opted not to reply. We are already in the play-offs! You could have made it easier by leaving the registration on.
What I mean to say is that I never heard of the Boyd C.
 
..... and my best guess was that it was the overweight lovechild of a Nord NC.854 and a Junkers F.13!

To which someone had attached a pair of Lysander wings.....

Anyway, enough of this badinage, back to the serious stuff. Here's one for them wot likes trimotors -
 

Attachments

  • twltm.jpg
    twltm.jpg
    32.5 KB · Views: 5
This looks like part of the Breguet Br 393 family. Not sure though as I can't find a photo of any that are uncowled.
 
Well, as I am a magnanimous sort of chap, we'll not quibble, though this is actually the one-and-only Breguet 392T, F-AMOD, used as a freighter by Air France. Unlike the 393's, it had Hispano-Suiza motors. :icon29: Over to Texas.

(note this one only partly-cowled, Moses. Must be something to do with the Gallic penchant for disrobing at the drop of a hat............well in most of the movies I've seen anyway.)
 

Attachments

  • 392T.jpg
    392T.jpg
    59 KB · Views: 5
Back
Top