Cratermaker
Charter Member
Got a link?There are higher resolution versions of this photo that also feature higher FPS counts. The tank is within a couple inches of his head.
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
Got a link?There are higher resolution versions of this photo that also feature higher FPS counts. The tank is within a couple inches of his head.
Ok, check it out. The Mirage F1 wingspan is 8.44 meters (27.3 FT). I froze the film at a point where we can see the shadow, and use this as a reference point to try to measure how high off the ground it is. We mark off the wing span, call it 8.44 meters, rotate it 90 degrees. Now we can compare "units of altitude" with the known wing span." Looks like there are 3.5 "units of altitude" within 8.44 meters, and that comes out to 2.41 meters, or 7.8 feet. Approximately!
PRB, I got lost at the transition to "units of altitude". I really think that the combination of video compression, and the scale being thrown off by the perspective makes it hard to analyze the video it face value.
That said, here's some more math...
The wingspan of the Mirage is 8.44 meters
The height of the average Frenchmen, age 20-29 is approximately 1.74 meters
View attachment 7459
LOL, OBIO, that's the first intelligent interpretation I've seen in this whole thread, lol. . .I was there the day the F-1 low fly over was filmed. The plane is not nearly as low as it looks. The guy standing in the middle of the runway is a freaking giant. He is 15 feet, 4 inches tall. He used to play pro basketball in Latvia, but was arrested in a goat smuggling ring. Latvians take their goats very seriously. Anyhow, after he was booted from Latvian basketball, the only job he could get was with the Patagonian Air National Guard as a run way marker. Those headphone things...they are actually two super bright flash lights. When planes are coming in toward the runway...he goes out and stands there, facing in the direction the plane is coming from....the planes see the two bright lights and can then more easily find the runway. It's a pretty miserable job, but what do you do after being arrested for goat smuggling?
LOL, OBIO, that's the first intelligent interpretation I've seen in this whole thread, lol. . .
In video photography, "location, location, location" is as important as it is in Real Estate! Camera location can distort the viewers perception to an unbelievable degree. It has to do with intentionally altering "perspective" and the tricks it plays on our eyes.
That's what is at work here. That jet is many feet above the man on the runway but camera perspective makes it look very close.
(yezzz - in before the close !!)![]()
Well it would be a pretty good interpretation...if it were true!LOL, OBIO, that's the first intelligent interpretation I've seen in this whole thread, lol. . .
Well it would be a pretty good interpretation...if it were true!
Firstly, it was only alleged goat smuggling
Secondly, he is Welsh, not Latvian, and
Lastly, he is a midget from Penmaenmawr, standing only 1m tall.
This means that the plane missed him by 6 millimeters!